Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Redleg

(7,007 posts)
109. Not to mention all the republicans who brought this about
Sat May 2, 2026, 05:32 PM
Saturday

Let's not forget the majority culprits in this sorry saga.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That's pretty much Mitch McConnell -misanthroptimist Saturday #1
If Al Gore had won in 2000, there would be no Roberts Court, no Samuel Alito, no Citizens United, lapucelle Saturday #3
That's an assumption about Gore Polybius Saturday #24
Gore would have been a far better President compared to bush LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #67
If the Rehnquist 5 hadn't stopped the legal Florida 2000 vote count DemocracyForever 4 hrs ago #196
How did he steal one from Biden? Polybius Saturday #22
Amy coney Barrett debsy Saturday #26
I see what you're saying Polybius Saturday #31
It's a steal due to McC's own standard set with Beer Bro -misanthroptimist Saturday #32
For clarity about McConnell's hypocrisy debsy Saturday #38
It was clearly hypocrisy--- since they blocked Obama's last SC nomination Jack Valentino Sunday #138
Even had they given Garland a vote, he still could have been voted down MichMan Sunday #167
as we will be under no obligation to give any Republican SC nominee a hearing or a vote, Jack Valentino Yesterday #191
Where did I say he wasn't due a vote; up or down? MichMan Yesterday #192
I'M SAYING IT !--- since McConnell made that the 'new norm'! Jack Valentino 15 hrs ago #193
Exactly this debsy Saturday #23
NO.. It's all of them. nt Cha Saturday #91
I wouldn't count both of them, but clearly fair to count one karynnj Saturday #99
And let's not forget Newt Gingerich and his Contract on America... IthinkThereforeIAM Sunday #156
Does that include those who helped confirm Thomas, Alito and Roberts? Fiendish Thingy Saturday #2
Sorry, that doesn't work on me. I told you who is on my list. Feel free to make your own list and post an OP. lapucelle Saturday #4
But your list includes 2024 voters Fiendish Thingy Saturday #6
Read more carefully. Like I said, it doesn't work on me. lapucelle Saturday #8
Yes, but - read up on the "shadow docket" - it is NOT only about SC justice appointments RandomNumbers Saturday #9
Indeed, those recent leaks reveal Roberts as the architect of the Shadow Docket Fiendish Thingy Saturday #14
But the effect of this corrupt court is greatly amplified by the 2nd TSF admin RandomNumbers Saturday #15
The recent murder of the final pillar of the VRA would have happened regardless of who was the current president Fiendish Thingy Saturday #18
'Strange and inconsistent criteria'? Bobstandard Saturday #28
There's nothing "strange and inconsistent" about calling out the folks who help Republicans win. lapucelle Saturday #41
Agree totally. Bobstandard Saturday #43
Fighting for Democrats and standing up to, taking on, calling out those helping Republicans win betsuni Saturday #55
No Kidding! But apparently we'd be Cha Saturday #97
Roberts and Alito were appointed by G.W. Bush, and the OP mentions 2000 muriel_volestrangler 8 hrs ago #195
Why not? SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #16
Unless one of the Liberals dies or retires, any new appointments won't matter. Fiendish Thingy Saturday #19
Every appointment matters SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #20
They will matter because Trump will appoint someone at least as bad, who will be there for the next 40 years. Crunchy Frog Saturday #34
It won't change the 6-3 make up of the court through 2028 Fiendish Thingy Saturday #42
That's short term thinking SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #47
I prefer to seek solutions Fiendish Thingy Saturday #56
Fine SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #60
Expansion is the most feasible option that exists Fiendish Thingy Saturday #62
It's still only one longshot option SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #63
It won't take 60 votes - that's where the courage requirement comes in Fiendish Thingy Saturday #65
Never claimed I had any SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #66
So, you agree then that expansion should be priority #1? Fiendish Thingy Saturday #75
The only thing I agree to SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #78
Enjoy your time in the quicksand of spleen venting. Fiendish Thingy Saturday #81
I prefer to seek realistic solutions SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #83
There is only one realistic solution Fiendish Thingy Saturday #90
Again, my point was always SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #92
It's been attempted. mzmolly Saturday #74
The court has been expanded and contracted numerous times throughout history Fiendish Thingy Saturday #76
We need congress, the senate and the White House. mzmolly Saturday #77
Enforcing article 3 section 2 of the U.S. constitution DemocracyForever 3 hrs ago #197
You are assuming that the court will be expanded. Honest question - RandomNumbers Saturday #50
The mechanism is legislation passed through congress Fiendish Thingy Saturday #58
Do you have confidence that all the likely D primary winners RandomNumbers Saturday #59
It must be a concerted effort and a litmus test for 2026 and 2028 Fiendish Thingy Saturday #61
Litmus test? mzmolly Saturday #73
They have plenty of vulnerabilities that Dems can exploit during their campaigns Fiendish Thingy Saturday #79
I disagree on the litmus test. mzmolly Saturday #82
Failure to expand the court means the Trump era will continue for decades Fiendish Thingy Saturday #88
Again, we need all three branches mzmolly Saturday #102
Without court expansion, we surrender the judicial branch for a generation Fiendish Thingy Saturday #115
I understand the concern. mzmolly Saturday #119
Only two are close to retiring, and here is how I expect that will work: Fiendish Thingy Saturday #121
Two is better than none. mzmolly Saturday #125
Two what? Fiendish Thingy Saturday #127
I'm sorry you don't understand my point. mzmolly Saturday #130
Litmus test AKA SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #80
Exactly. We know what's coming, right? mzmolly Saturday #84
Yup SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #87
The court should be expanded mantra, mzmolly Saturday #72
And Barron would serve for 50 years mcar Saturday #96
If the court were expanded to 15 seats after Barron were appointed, I could live with that Fiendish Thingy Saturday #101
Anyone who refused to make way for a younger successor? BeyondGeography Saturday #5
Bernie Sanders is 84. Nixie Saturday #10
Lol BeyondGeography Saturday #11
LOL indeed. Nixie Saturday #13
I believe the Supreme Court is the topic under whathehell Saturday #33
That was also already answered. None of this Supreme Court Nixie Saturday #118
What was already answered? whathehell Saturday #124
Of course you don't. Ageism doesn't apply when you like Nixie Sunday #139
Your assumption is laughably off the mark. whathehell Sunday #171
There is actual history about my comment. It's obvious why you would not recognize it. Nixie Sunday #172
Sorry, but what 'history' are you referencing? whathehell Sunday #173
As I said, it's very obvious you are not going to get it. Nixie Sunday #175
Lol..No one else seems to be "getting it" either whathehell Sunday #186
Your version of "no one else " also doesn't get it. Nixie Sunday #187
..Is this really the best you can do? whathehell Sunday #188
I certainly believe you when you say you don't get it. Nixie Sunday #189
Exactly, Nixie... The Bottom Line. Cha Sunday #135
Hi Cha! It's so interesting to see how the selective ageism Nixie Sunday #140
Yeah, isn't it, though. Cha Sunday #142
Yes, I definitely remember all the scolds about the Supreme Court being a distraction from the *real* evil -- Nixie Sunday #145
Well Done, Nixie.. Cha Sunday #146
"It must be a fantastic speech, a brilliant speech, which you would want to share with the American betsuni Sunday #147
We were constantly scolded during the 2016 GE, Cha mcar Sunday #177
Dismissed as "identity politics." The white working class men who take showers at the end of the day revolution betsuni Sunday #180
And now voting rights and reproductive freedom are gone mcar Sunday #183
Creating dysfunction and blaming it on others. betsuni Sunday #185
And just last night... SocialDemocrat61 Saturday #17
Yes. I'm almost afraid to mention that on this forum. Crunchy Frog Saturday #37
"FUCK YOU," and you better vote for the Democratic nominee this time! Martin Eden Saturday #7
Ruth Ginsburg should have retired n/t leftstreet Saturday #12
We would still have the Roberts Court, Samuel Alito, Citizens United, and two out of the three Trump conservatives. lapucelle Saturday #21
Gore shouldn't have run with LIEberman leftstreet Saturday #25
Yep. progressoid Saturday #44
Gore Did Because JL Was First To Criticize Bill/Monica. ColoringFool Saturday #106
Oh, it is more than just her being "a liberal female justice" Behind the Aegis Saturday #93
Funny how it's Ruth Bader Ginsberg's fault and Al Gore's fault for picking Joe Lieberman. lapucelle Saturday #114
Hillary warned us LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #179
Damn right. Things wouldn't be perfect if Obama had chosen her replacement, but they'd be a hell of a lot better. Crunchy Frog Saturday #40
;-{) MISSING JUSTICE Goonch Saturday #27
Kick & Rec mcar Saturday #29
Remarkable that folks blame Al Gore and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, lapucelle Saturday #39
Feebly blaming Democrats, smirking "we could do this all day." Why? What's the point? Hating Democrats? betsuni Saturday #57
If you dig deeper, I am sure you could find a "coincidence". Behind the Aegis Saturday #94
It never changes. Always someone else to hold responsible mcar Saturday #95
They' were not paying attention to Cha Saturday #108
That's the way to pull in votes - TBF Saturday #30
Third party voters and folks for whom Democrats are never good enough lapucelle Saturday #36
They are a majority now. How do we win without them? progressoid Saturday #45
Third party voters and *protest* nonvoters are not the majority of voters. N/T lapucelle Saturday #46
And yet, they often decide elections which has consequences progressoid Saturday #51
You're conflating third party voters and purity-protest nonvoters with politically independent voters. lapucelle Saturday #53
Exactly. TY for explaining that. nt Cha Saturday #111
Too many naval-gazers don't understand (or don't care) how our political process actually works dlk Saturday #35
Where is Ralph Nader these days? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Saturday #48
92 And Still A Gadfly: ColoringFool Saturday #107
We could have packed that damn court between 2020 and 2022 if Democrats had been bold risk takers instead of lees1975 Saturday #49
"Aukshully, I blame Al Gore, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Democrats in general". lapucelle Saturday #52
The inability to recognize and hopefully fix failures in our party are most often led by those blaming Melon Sunday #141
Perhaps it sounds like "the voters who don't vote" but the people being blamed are, in fact, the ASSHOLES RandomNumbers Sunday #164
Let me add another hearty one. betsuni Saturday #54
I could not agree more!! aeromanKC Saturday #64
Karl Rove funded Nader in 2000 and 2004 LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #68
Nader is still an asshole who refuses to admit he elected Bush or that Stein elected trump LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #69
. mzmolly Saturday #70
Don't forget anyone who listens to garbage from Rush Limbaugh, Fox News, or their megachurch pastors. Initech Saturday #71
Those are Republican voters who wanted bigots and fascists to control the Supreme Court. betsuni Saturday #86
Well,.. That's a very negative attitude you have there..... magicarpet Saturday #85
I know, lapucelle... It's heart sickening 💔 Cha Saturday #89
People who want to blame voters, I wonder what your plan is for the next race? biocube Saturday #98
I live with right wingers Keepthesoulalive Saturday #112
Elections aren't convincing people who don't vote like you to vote like you. biocube Saturday #120
No Keepthesoulalive Saturday #122
I lived in a small towns most of my life biocube Saturday #126
This last election was weighted by influencers Keepthesoulalive Sunday #144
My plan is the same as it is every year: work hard to elect Democrats who can win. lapucelle Saturday #116
Nobody more classic New Deal liberal Democratic than Biden. No vote for him/Harris, New Deal not important. betsuni Saturday #129
" campaign like New Deal Democrats"? SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #151
Well well well, this does seem to have ruffled some feathers here. flvegan Saturday #100
Bill Clinton used to say that hit dogs holler. lapucelle Sunday #158
Holding grudges is bad for you. BWdem4life Saturday #103
Interesting that you choose to focus on 2016 when the OP is about 2000, 2016, and 2024. lapucelle Saturday #117
Ok, good point BWdem4life Saturday #123
So your contention is that some folks on Democratic Underground don't vote for Democrats lapucelle Sunday #148
Is that what the OP is about? BWdem4life Sunday #155
Sorry, that doesn't work on me. lapucelle Sunday #174
Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #184
Post removed Post removed Saturday #104
I agree with the op, B.See Saturday #105
Not to mention all the republicans who brought this about Redleg Saturday #109
This is specifically why we BEGGED people to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. LetMyPeopleVote Saturday #110
In my best judge's voice, "I'll allow it..." Torchlight Saturday #113
Add Miriam Adelson and her dead husband that gave over $300 million to Trump to your list of bigots and fascists PufPuf23 Saturday #128
Post removed Post removed Sunday #131
You are back again! sheshe2 Sunday #132
lol.. "proud of voting" for a Liar. That Cha Sunday #133
Brava! sheshe2 Sunday #134
DU Thanks YOu! This is a Cha Sunday #136
You are very welcome. sheshe2 Sunday #137
Post removed Post removed Sunday #169
Right now... Hope22 Sunday #143
I'm going to put the blame where it belongs. Elected Republicans, the media and elected Democrats Autumn Sunday #149
Wondering if there is a hearty "FUCK YOU AWARD" for the ones Emile Sunday #150
So republicans? SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #152
There should be. Autumn Sunday #154
They will get one from me, if they don't come to their senses pretty quickly. RandomNumbers Sunday #165
You are perfectly free to exonerate third party voters and entitled non-voting protestors. lapucelle Sunday #153
A politicians job in the campaign is to listen to the voters, get out there and get those votes. Autumn Sunday #157
Folks are perfectly free to exonerate third party voters and purity protest nonvoters, lapucelle Sunday #159
I have no power to exonerate anyone. Neither do you. No politician is owed a persons vote. Autumn Sunday #162
If a (somewhat) figurative use of a fairly common verb is too tricky, let me simplify. lapucelle Sunday #163
And when they lose the primary, get out there and get those votes for the NOMINEE RandomNumbers Sunday #166
Don't forget SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #160
Eddie Glaude is so embarrassed by his editorial that he got Time to remove his byline. lapucelle Sunday #168
He's been getting roasted the last few days SocialDemocrat61 Sunday #170
Ha! Didn't know that. betsuni Sunday #176
Blame repubs not progressive. returnee Sunday #161
Good old punching left when the right does horrible things. BlueTsunami2018 Sunday #178
They always know better...like Biden 2024 was so obviously the right call BeyondGeography Sunday #190
Clinton warned us of possible Trump Supreme Court nominations LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #181
Americans are not thinkers Keepthesoulalive Sunday #182
K & R SunSeeker 9 hrs ago #194
Post removed Post removed 2 hrs ago #198
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A hearty "FUCK YOU" to an...»Reply #109