Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The nation is back to accomodating the white majority, enabling the disadvantaging of all other race groups [View all]PCB66
(154 posts)45. My point is that
Supreme Court Justices are partisan just like almost almost everybody else in government.
As long as they do what you like you love them. If they don't do what you like they are assholes.
it doesn't make any difference if there are nine of them or 109.
If your point is if their are 109 then that should make the field more even then that may or may not not be valid. What if the mix is 54 appointed by Liberal Presidents and 55 appointed by Conservatives? You are back to the same problem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The nation is back to accomodating the white majority, enabling the disadvantaging of all other race groups [View all]
bigtree
Wednesday
OP
The only white people he truly accommodates are the likes of Musk and Bezos
fujiyamasan
Saturday
#46
Excellent from Wendell Phillips: "Governments exist to protect the rights of minorities..."
erronis
Wednesday
#3
What a wise observation. I wonder if that is widely held amongst the legal academics.
erronis
Wednesday
#7
Up next, they will try to make segregation in education, housing, and work legal again.
ShazamIam
Wednesday
#5
Oh, yes - of course. And then remove that pesky amendment about women's rights.
erronis
Wednesday
#8
I agree it is likely, they can claim the original documents don't include women and the amendments that recognize women
ShazamIam
Wednesday
#9
I am loving that there are 4 women on the U.S. Supreme Court even if one of them is a conservative.
ShazamIam
Thursday
#16
Missed the SC ruling that prohibits Civil Rights group suing in regards to VRA sec 2 said discriminations back then...
electric_blue68
Wednesday
#15
It's one thing to reverse precedent. But it's another thing to strike down established legislation
Buckeyeblue
Friday
#31
The MAGAts aren't real crazy about women of any color either. F*ck all of them.
Greybnk48
Friday
#32