Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,712 posts)

10. It's a well-written argument for such a quick action - and the court they picked is all Obama appointees

Reply to RandySF (Original post)

Fri May 1, 2026, 09:06 PM

Yesterday

But the court above is the 5th circuit... and more challenging perhaps than that... they don't seem to have a good reason to remove the issue from the court that SCOTUS sent the case back down to. I'm not sure why they wouldn't retain jurisdiction

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Rhiannon12866

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Louisiana sued for suspending active election, nullifying votes to draft GOP gerrymander [View all] RandySF Yesterday OP

scum court Whip-poor-will Yesterday #1

White separatist court. Baitball Blogger Yesterday #8

Why it Matters (to me) Roy Rolling Yesterday #2

I suspect Tennessee will do the same Farmer-Rick Yesterday #3

You gotta love Mark Elias...... SergeStorms Yesterday #4

Good. Martin68 Yesterday #5

Of course. This is 100% SCOTUS bait. Initech Yesterday #6

I'm actually impressed with how the Democrats have responded. Instead of rolling over and playing dead, they've been Fil1957 Yesterday #7

They are utterly lawless debsy Yesterday #9

It's a well-written argument for such a quick action - and the court they picked is all Obama appointees FBaggins Yesterday #10