General Discussion

What is so sacred about having the law of the land in the hands of a tiny few people? Why should six people be in a position to determine who can and cannot vote?

Far better to have a massive number. I don't care if you draw random panels from the whole group or if it ends up acting more like a legislative body.

As it sits, we will likely have Trump/Federalist Society constitutional interpretation for the next generation.

What's so great about that?

Also, I disagree with your glib "if they rule my way, they're good, otherwise they suck."

If they rule a way that I'd rather they didn't, on a close call, with reasoned, well supported arguments, that's the breaks.

But that's not what this court is doing. This court is making shit up out of whole cloth.

And that, not whether I agree with their rulings, is the mark of a rogue, evil court.