Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should the Dems expand the SCOTUS to 13 justices [View all]sl8
(17,137 posts)41. 2021 Final Report from the Presidential Commission on SCOTUS:
The report used to be accessible at the whitehouse.gov site, but any of those links I've found are now dead ( BTW, my spellcheck helpfully replaced the "whitehouse" I typed with "shithouse" ). Chapter 2 of the report covers the membership and size of the court, with arguments for and against expansion.
Full report (pdf):
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/sites/default/files/documents_with_attached_files/376063/168144.pdf
Cover letter (pasted below) and more from The American Presidency Project (UC Santa Barbara):
https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/final-report-the-presidential-commission-the-supreme-court-the-united-states
Final Report by the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States
December 08, 2021
Dear Mr. President:
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States established by your Executive Order 14023 respectfully submits its Report. At its public meeting on December 7, 2021, the Commission voted unanimously to approve this submission upon concluding that it had met its charge to provide an account of the current debate over the "role and operation of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system" and an "analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals."
The Commission was immensely assisted in its work by the diversity of perspectives and expertise among the Commissioners, written and oral testimony provided by experts and organizations in connection with the Commission's hearings, the public's engagement in the Commission's work through the submission of comments, and excellent support from the staff at the General Services Administration.
We are honored to have had the opportunity to examine and then present to you an analysis of these complex and often controversial issues.
Respectfully,
Bob Bauer
Co-Chair
Cristina Rodríguez
Co-Chair
Kate Andrias
Rapporteur
December 08, 2021
Dear Mr. President:
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States established by your Executive Order 14023 respectfully submits its Report. At its public meeting on December 7, 2021, the Commission voted unanimously to approve this submission upon concluding that it had met its charge to provide an account of the current debate over the "role and operation of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system" and an "analysis of the principal arguments in the contemporary public debate for and against Supreme Court reform, including an appraisal of the merits and legality of particular reform proposals."
The Commission was immensely assisted in its work by the diversity of perspectives and expertise among the Commissioners, written and oral testimony provided by experts and organizations in connection with the Commission's hearings, the public's engagement in the Commission's work through the submission of comments, and excellent support from the staff at the General Services Administration.
We are honored to have had the opportunity to examine and then present to you an analysis of these complex and often controversial issues.
Respectfully,
Bob Bauer
Co-Chair
Cristina Rodríguez
Co-Chair
Kate Andrias
Rapporteur
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Besides which we need a Democratic president to make decent SC nominations---
Jack Valentino
Friday
#90
I'm pretty sure the assumption is Democrats would get rid of the filibuster in order to pass this.
Wiz Imp
Friday
#55
Yeah.. It is an uphill battle, though the SCOTUS review that included Lawrence Tribe, did recommend
hlthe2b
Thursday
#10
Well, of course, there were people screaming for court expansion long before the commission was formed
Fiendish Thingy
Friday
#53
What if the Republicans agreed with that logic and increased it to 13 themselves?
MichMan
Sunday
#92
Dems must not govern from fear of what republicans might do once back in power
Fiendish Thingy
Thursday
#18
That hasn't been working out for the last 30 years... and we've been winning elections.
In It to Win It
Friday
#74
We so need young blood in both houses of congress with fresh new provocative and
magicarpet
Friday
#70
Making all US territories states would significantly exacerbate an already horrible imbalance of representation
Wiz Imp
Friday
#58
Huh? Adding states with population under 50,000 gives California more power? Seriously?
Wiz Imp
Friday
#78
My search showed the representative of Puerto Rico was Jenniffer Gonzalez Colon who became Governor of Puerto Rico last
Wiz Imp
Friday
#81
So your solution to California being drowned out by smaller , less diverse states
Wiz Imp
Friday
#84
And you are perfectly fine with voters in American Samoa and Northern Mariana Islands having 800 times the voting power
Wiz Imp
Friday
#86
Term limits is the better idea IMO. expansion becomes a runaway game where the Pubs just add more later
Amishman
Friday
#56
Nothing happens until AIPAC's influence within the Democratic Party is reduced and minimized
Ponietz
Friday
#68
There is no chance in hell we are getting term limits on Supreme Court Justices in a
standingtall
Friday
#87