Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandomNumbers

(19,248 posts)
46. Yeah and I bet they're just loving what they got?
Wed Apr 29, 2026, 07:27 PM
Apr 29

because they're idiots? GMAFB.

I'm just not seeing how anyone who ***** ACTUALLY ***** CARES ABOUT other human beings in any part of the fucking planet, could have supported TRUMP WINNING THE ELECTION over holding their goddamn pure privileged noses and voting for the person who would BE LESS BAD for one segment of humanity and INCALCULABLY BETTER for the rest of the world.

Don't say anyone didn't know who TSF was before the 2024 election.

So yeah the "but Gaza" excuse holds no water whatsoever.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Video of the interview here: Fiendish Thingy Apr 29 #1
Thank you! TheProle Apr 29 #2
timing truddy777 Apr 29 #3
I canvassed for Harris and I can tell you that support of Israel's genocide ... CousinIT Apr 29 #4
Sometimes you can't fix stupid. bottomofthehill Apr 29 #6
Precisely. Heard a lot of sqawk B.See Apr 29 #45
Mahalo for some Reality, bottomofthehill! Cha Thursday #62
So people are angry with Harris SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #9
Cute but allow me to phrase it a different way. Why are these voters mad? AloeVera Apr 29 #10
Sounds like they just looking for a reason SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #11
It's much worse. They blame the Party. AloeVera Apr 29 #15
Yep. Being perceived as being in bed with AIPAC is a recipe for disaster. Queso Delicioso Apr 29 #16
THIS RIGHT HERE sboatcar Apr 29 #31
Gaza would have happened SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #17
Bibi bombed gaza for weeks before Obama was sworn in questionseverything Apr 29 #18
Only 20% of Israel's military hardware SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #19
That seems false. AloeVera Apr 29 #38
You're confusing funding SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #43
Read it again. AloeVera Apr 29 #47
But Israel doesn't buy all their arms from U.S.arms manufacturers. SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #49
We've reached the end of this discussion. You are moving the goalposts. AloeVera Apr 29 #50
No I never brought up Israel SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #52
Israel Cirsium Apr 29 #51
My apologies SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #53
Thanks Cirsium Thursday #60
I do that too! Bettie Thursday #68
Gee and I wonder why anyone would need an excuse RandomNumbers Apr 29 #44
They are angry with Democrats in general for continuing to support Israel & taking AIPAC money. CousinIT Apr 29 #22
Ok SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #25
They don't want reps owned by Israel. CousinIT Apr 29 #30
There are a lot of pacs far worse than SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #33
In terms of large, powerful PACs who give a substantial amount to Democrats, there are few, if any, worse than AIPAC. Celerity Thursday #61
Never said AIPAC was good SocialDemocrat61 Thursday #64
Of course those are bad too, but AIPAC (whose RW massive donors often have common agendas with those industries you Celerity Thursday #65
Can we agree all pacs are bad? SocialDemocrat61 Thursday #67
Not all PACs are bad in terms of intent & impact. I reserve the right to call out the worst ones, which includes AIPAC. Celerity Thursday #69
I disagree SocialDemocrat61 Thursday #70
Oh, I would love it if ALL PACs and all private money were removed from US politics. Like you said, the concept is bad. Celerity Thursday #71
Here's the deal. Some broke, flakey candidates are making up lies about their opponents accepting AIPAC money. LeftInTX Apr 29 #36
Yeah and I bet they're just loving what they got? RandomNumbers Apr 29 #46
Why would we share our weakness for others to exploit. bottomofthehill Apr 29 #5
Right now it could be a strength leftstreet Apr 29 #8
They could at least reassure voters something along the lines of Rob H. Apr 29 #34
I don't understand the purpose of accessing the report? happy feet Apr 29 #26
They already exploited it BWdem4life Apr 29 #39
I don't see that at all. I support the Democratic Cha Thursday #63
Who cares? SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #7
I'm not sure these are the issues the an election autopsy report is designed to confront? Ilikepurple Apr 29 #20
Most people don't care SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #23
I would say that even less people care to silence expression of this issue, but here we are. Ilikepurple Apr 29 #56
Not trying to silence anything SocialDemocrat61 Apr 29 #57
Because the old guard doesn't want to have to take the heat for loosing. republianmushroom Apr 29 #12
Speculation: I think it shows sarisataka Apr 29 #13
I have no idea what's in the report, but I like what you say here. NBachers Apr 29 #14
The autopsy is very similar to the 2016 one AZProgressive Apr 29 #21
Release the files! LiberalLovinLug Apr 29 #24
David Hogg said good riddance when a LeftInTX Apr 29 #29
They forced him out of his position as vice chair of the DNC LiberalLovinLug Apr 29 #37
What good would it do to have someone who does not support every Democratic nominee? LeftInTX Apr 29 #40
Tell that to Mandami. AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar.... LiberalLovinLug Thursday #72
They aren't running the DNC!!!! LeftInTX Thursday #73
So you can't see the relationship of the DNC in promoting candidates into elected officials? That's their job. LiberalLovinLug Thursday #74
I hope they're enjoying what they got MorbidButterflyTat Apr 29 #27
Sounds fishy to me. Joinfortmill Apr 29 #28
Yesterday in a statewide meeting it was said... OhioBack2Blue Apr 29 #32
Our new Texas Democratic Party Chair supports rural outreach. He even created a satellite office in Amarillo LeftInTX Apr 29 #35
Sadly after today's Supreme Court ruling, voters will just blame Democrats if they don't win more congressional seats. LeftInTX Apr 29 #41
must be pretty juicy! WhiskeyGrinder Apr 29 #42
Gaza, for sure played a part fujiyamasan Apr 29 #48
Very bad look Cirsium Apr 29 #54
The obvious answer is: b/c it blames party leadership (including elected ones) and big donors, RockRaven Apr 29 #55
Democracy dies in darkness Cerulean Southpaw Apr 29 #58
The lack of transparency is not a good look for the DNC fujiyamasan Thursday #59
You Know You're Reading An Unbiased Article When You See "Genocidal Attack." ColoringFool Thursday #66
I was pretty appauled by the interview Takket Friday #75
This sounds like typical Ken Martin dflprincess Friday #76
Message auto-removed Name removed Saturday #77
My guess is it goes far beyond Gaza Buckeyeblue Saturday #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Why Wouldn't You Just Re...»Reply #46