Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regardless of what you think of James Comey, his indictment and order for arrest.... [View all]LetMyPeopleVote
(181,598 posts)32. MaddowBlog-The case against Comey will almost certainly fail. For Trump, that's not the point.
The new indictment against the former FBI director checks a set of boxes for the president, none of which has anything to do with securing a conviction.
The case against Comey will obviously fail, but a conviction isnât the point. For Trump, the indictment:
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2026-04-29T13:01:38.440Z
- makes clear that he can prosecute his enemies based on nothing but his whims, without regard for merit or evidence
- scares other prosecutors into obedience
- imposes hardships on a foe
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/the-case-against-comey-will-almost-certainly-fail-for-trump-thats-not-the-point
Whats more, the idea that prosecutors might eventually secure a conviction in this case is ludicrous on its face, though thats almost certainly the point of this corrupt exercise. In her latest column, Barbara McQuade, a former Michigan U.S. attorney and an MS NOW legal analyst, explained:
To be sure, I dont doubt that the president and those who are doing his bidding would be delighted to see Comey found guilty, but given how pitiful the case is, thats unrealistic.
Theres no reason to assume, however, that a conviction is Trumps intended endpoint. On the contrary, given the broader context, the new indictment checks a different set of boxes for the Republican president.
First, Trump appears eager to make it clear that he can orchestrate federal prosecutions based entirely on his whims and petty desires, without regard for merit or evidence. There is, for all intents and purposes, a White House enemies list, and the president seems eager to intimidate and instill fear on those whose names appear on it.
Second, Trump is sending an unsubtle signal to other federal prosecutors who might be inclined to prioritize the rule of law over the White Houses wishes. Indeed, when it comes to the pursuit of the former FBI director, prosecutors who chose not to bring charges against Comey were replaced with those who would follow political instructions. As a second set of charges moves forward, the message to other prosecutors couldnt be clearer: Play along with the revenge campaign, or face unemployment.
And third, the Comey conviction allows the president to effectively argue that he can force his perceived enemies to endure legal, personal and financial hardships as a direct consequence of their defiance of him, even if the indictments are a joke, and even if the defendants are ultimately acquitted.
Trying to convict the former FBI director is largely irrelevant. The corruption is the point.
Even if the Justice Department cannot convict Comey, prosecutors can make his life miserable for several months by forcing him to pay for a lawyer, occupy his time and attention, emotionally exhaust his family and disparage his reputation.
To be sure, I dont doubt that the president and those who are doing his bidding would be delighted to see Comey found guilty, but given how pitiful the case is, thats unrealistic.
Theres no reason to assume, however, that a conviction is Trumps intended endpoint. On the contrary, given the broader context, the new indictment checks a different set of boxes for the Republican president.
First, Trump appears eager to make it clear that he can orchestrate federal prosecutions based entirely on his whims and petty desires, without regard for merit or evidence. There is, for all intents and purposes, a White House enemies list, and the president seems eager to intimidate and instill fear on those whose names appear on it.
Second, Trump is sending an unsubtle signal to other federal prosecutors who might be inclined to prioritize the rule of law over the White Houses wishes. Indeed, when it comes to the pursuit of the former FBI director, prosecutors who chose not to bring charges against Comey were replaced with those who would follow political instructions. As a second set of charges moves forward, the message to other prosecutors couldnt be clearer: Play along with the revenge campaign, or face unemployment.
And third, the Comey conviction allows the president to effectively argue that he can force his perceived enemies to endure legal, personal and financial hardships as a direct consequence of their defiance of him, even if the indictments are a joke, and even if the defendants are ultimately acquitted.
Trying to convict the former FBI director is largely irrelevant. The corruption is the point.
I will never forgive Comey for helping elect trump. I was training voter protection attorneys and poll watchers at a downtown law office when one of my firm's associates who was attending the class gave me a funny look. While I was in middle of the class, Comey had announced that they re-opened the Clinton investigation due to emails on Clinton's assistant computer. When I found out, I was shocked because the FBI and DOJ were not supposed to do anything political just before the election. Comey help get trump elected and now trump is persecuting Comey
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Regardless of what you think of James Comey, his indictment and order for arrest.... [View all]
kentuck
Apr 28
OP
There was a cottage industry of "86 46" merchandise and there's one for "86 47" merchandise.
Vinca
Apr 28
#2
I wonder if Maureen Comey's lawsuit against the admin. for illegal firing has anything to really be one of the
SheilaAnn
Apr 28
#5
MaddowBlog-Comey's second indictment shows the lengths Blanche will go to please Trump
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 28
#6
Watts v. United States (1969)-Court said anti-war protester's threat was crude political hyperbole
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 28
#7
Update: The US Marshals have been ORDERED by a federal judge in North Carolina to take James Comey into CUSTODY!
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 28
#12
MS NOW-The Comey indictment is just one way the DOJ is being newly weaponized
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 28
#14
MaddowBlog-The case against Comey will almost certainly fail. For Trump, that's not the point.
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 29
#32