Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why I really hate this deal [View all]Chan790
(20,176 posts)40. Permanent just means no sunset...
if you'd listened to both the Senate and House Democrats speeches in debate, you'd know that permanent in this sense doesn't mean much longer than it takes to escape this recession.
There is future-intent towards tax-increases framed as tax-increases. Congressional Dems made that clear.
Some people are arguing for Clinton-era rates. A few are arguing for Reagan-era rates. I'm arguing for Carter-era rates. Nobody will be arguing for Obama-era rates.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

"I don't considere members of the top 20% to be part of the middle class either."
ProSense
Jan 2013
#4
it's an awful deal, totally unnecessary except to set up the next manufactured crisis....
mike_c
Jan 2013
#8
Thank You, and Welcome! It's ridiculous, but like John Boehner, the left can't take "yes".....
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#36
Hey! Write a long letter to Bernie Sanders and Dennis Kucinich about it! Oh wait...........
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#46
It's awful ain't it? Why, oh why didn't we elect Jill, or Roseanne, or Rocky? WHY?
Tarheel_Dem
Jan 2013
#37