Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lucky Luciano

(11,864 posts)
23. I like the way you wrote this.
Thu Apr 2, 2026, 03:01 PM
Thursday

(Though 90% is quite an exaggeration, the chances are high enough to warrant legitimate concern)

I think the current generation of AI is sort of between your number 1 and 2 depending on the user.

I primarily think of it as a pretty amazing search engine or way to get quick answers to questions that you can’t easily search for. My next use case is to have it analyze my work - Eg a write up I made, some math I did and want to verify, a PowerPoint I made, etc. One of my worst traits is that I am only semi literate…grammar and spelling are fine (typos…we won’t talk about that)…but I tend to provide more information than people want….so, it’s great at trimming down my word vomit to all that needs to be said.

Straight up plagiarism…not so much for me…closest thing would be that I want to run an experiment with code that is not worth the time if I am going to spend days coding up when I have only a small bit of confidence it will be useful…if I can give it proper instructions, it can code it up very fast for me and I can run the experiment that way…that is worth it. The value is in thinking of the experiment rather than grunt work of coding it up which ai is great for. In production, I would be far more cautious.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 of 2 things are going to happen WSHazel Thursday #1
Greed............. Lovie777 Thursday #2
Or nitpicked Thursday #11
The pie of potential AI users is finite. How much AI is enough AI? flashman13 Thursday #18
I like the way you wrote this. Lucky Luciano Thursday #23
IIRC they are in trouble newdeal2 Thursday #3
Ellison forgot what made Oracle a good, reliable company - haele Thursday #17
Oracle has had a great run. quaint Thursday #4
Larry Ellison bet against the house by sucking up to the fucking asshole. Initech Thursday #13
You know who needs to be replaced? Kid Berwyn Thursday #5
He's a real POS marmar Thursday #6
Very true jfz9580m Thursday #20
This should provoke a mass exit of his tic toc viewership Clouds Passing Thursday #7
The fact that a company can lay off tens of thousands The Revolution Thursday #8
I hope he get buried in worthless stock. marble falls Thursday #9
Appears that he's a little cash strapped after Saudi decided not to fund his purchase of merger. This in2herbs Thursday #10
No federal funds for companies that refuse to provide jobs for Americans. travelingthrulife Thursday #12
I suspect that a lot of these people will find jobs as Oracle DB administrators, or the like (supporting Oracle-related SWBTATTReg Thursday #14
What are people for? maxsolomon Thursday #15
I'm not shocked he over leveraged his company with his purchase of cbs and Warner bros media kimbutgar Thursday #16
He doesn't own Warner Bros yet, just has made an offer that won't close until maybe September/October 2026 ToxMarz Thursday #22
I hope he backs out of the deal as the economy gets worst and oracle loses stock value. kimbutgar Thursday #24
That's what I think, too Deminpenn Yesterday #26
There are no ethical billionaires. n/t Coventina Thursday #19
Damn. I kinda doubt that Paramount purchase is going to pay off, as well. nt Exp Thursday #21
Is this the Golden Age? Scott Alan Swaggerty Yesterday #25
I happen to know that TheFarseer Yesterday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Larry Ellison's Oracle la...»Reply #23