Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,320 posts)
59. jfc
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 02:22 PM
Mar 30

....this shit again.

Dems=failure.

That's essentially his message. That's what will be conveyed.

It's goddamn bullshit.

The 'generational' crap is belied by the way seasoned Democrats have repeatedly and consistently produced for the people in the majority. THAT should be the message, but instead we have this navelgazing crap that supposes we've done nothing at all. Where the fuck was he when we were passing historic legislation in the Biden term with Chuck Schumer as majority leader?

Why kick the party when we're down? NOT ONE ELECTED DEMOCRAT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LAST ELECTION LOSSES.

Those elected Dems he's pushing off of here have actually fought and WON against republicans. Posturing as if there's something wrong with them because some younger candidate didn't do the same is just sophistry; a specious and self-defeating argument, especially making it at the behest of one of the worst media demagogues in the business.

Just BRILLIANT politics displayed here by Booker basically taking a cue from Welker to trash Dems, I tell ya.

We EXCEL in the majority, USHERING IN HISTORIC PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATIVE CHANGE and are limited in the minority to making statements LIKE THIS.

You'd think people would be self aware and recognize that this is nothing but anti-Democratic messaging; screeds that are exploited by trolls on social media everyday.

But here we are with another person posturing as if he's better than everyone else in the party that's fighting the same battles and wants the very same things he does, as badly as he does, and acting as if anti-Democratic party messaging is some sort of political genius or some sort of political rallying call for voters.

It's just not. It reads and sounds like someone who hasn't yet achieved what he's exhorting everyone else to do, and is acting as if he's above it all. It's just a turn-off.

It's even more ridiculous supposing he's primed to say something that hasn't already been said; or is poised to put on some political performance that's going to change a vote among the people he works with.

Just grandstanding and pushing off on his own party as if he had actually done something to coalesce and organize the coalition of elected Democrats that we have now and is ready to present a workable coalition to advance legislation (which is what he's basically complaining about, or should be); or that his words represent something other than his own projections.

That performative spiel should be reserved for the actual republican opposition. And anyone taking comfort in this should check and see just how many voters have been encouraged by this TO SUPPORT THE PARTY AT ELECTION TIME.

Because that's virtually ALL he's done here is project counterproductive nonsense about Democrats, and helped normalize the bullshit notion presented here by Welker about 'purity tests,' whatever that means to that inveterate cipher for her news org's bullshit takes-of-the-day against Democrats.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Please find this Dem another candidate. Thank you. efhmc Mar 30 #1
Agreed BaronChocula Mar 30 #45
Agree WiVoter Mar 30 #57
There is no "right" there is only MAGA BeyondGeography Mar 30 #2
Really! Cory Has Nowhere to Go .. He Is the Embodiment of the Left MAGA Hates! TearsOfDaClowned Mar 30 #6
"MAGA's" dream opponent is a technocrat. A real "adult in the room". David__77 Mar 30 #8
He's right. Democrats don't need purity tests SocialDemocrat61 Mar 30 #3
Poppycock NoRethugFriends Mar 30 #9
Thanks for sharing SocialDemocrat61 Mar 30 #13
Care to Elaborate? quakerboy Mar 30 #50
So Gore, Clinton and Harris SocialDemocrat61 Mar 30 #51
Yes quakerboy Tuesday #80
How so? SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #82
You first. quakerboy Tuesday #83
So you don't have an answer SocialDemocrat61 Tuesday #86
I always hope for better quakerboy Wednesday #94
Okay SocialDemocrat61 Wednesday #98
Bookmarking. n/t rzemanfl Mar 30 #52
Phony issue, sounds like he is trying out to run the "Problem Solvers Caucus". displacedvermoter Mar 30 #4
any Roosevelt out there? Tetrachloride Mar 30 #5
DURec leftstreet Mar 30 #7
Cory needs to work on messaging - TBF Mar 30 #10
Just lost my vote kacekwl Mar 30 #11
That's literal for me because I'm in his state. JHB Mar 30 #41
You've just proved his point! MorbidButterflyTat Mar 30 #58
Purity tests may be necessary gulliver Mar 30 #12
Just found one in Nebraska. Blue Full Moon Mar 30 #16
People who administer purity tests are gatekeepers gulliver Mar 30 #30
Post removed Post removed Mar 30 #14
An example of a "purity test." question everything Mar 30 #17
That's not a win for democrats it's a win for republicans. Blue Full Moon Mar 30 #20
Booker is pretty damn far down the list of problematic senators. W_HAMILTON Mar 30 #29
Looks like he is failing, last ditch effort by running for president. Blue Full Moon Mar 30 #22
I'll bet a good number of dems do. Blame the system. CrispyQ Mar 30 #32
I was impressed by him recently on Sunday Morning question everything Mar 30 #15
Yeah yeah Cory LR3 Mar 30 #18
I don't get it. Could you please elaborate, LR3? Thanks ❤️ littlemissmartypants Mar 30 #38
It is part of a famous skit LR3 Mar 30 #47
Got it. Thanks. ❤️👋 littlemissmartypants Mar 30 #48
Piggy and the MAGAts MorbidButterflyTat Mar 30 #60
By "this point" I mean LR3 Mar 30 #70
Isn't Cory Booker the "bland milquetoast" (your words) guy who gave the 25 hour speech lapucelle Tuesday #73
The same Cory Booker that sat in a protest action on the Capitol steps regarding Republican budget plans, Autumn Tuesday #74
Do you know why Cory Booker voted to confirm Charles Kushner? lapucelle Tuesday #75
I really don't care why he did it. He voted to confirm a felon. A felon family member Autumn Tuesday #76
"I really don't care why he did it" says it all. lapucelle Tuesday #77
Purity my ass. There's the right thing to do and the wrong thing to do. Autumn Tuesday #78
My goodness, that certainly sounds like an in-group out-group dichotomy predicated on arbitrary boundaries. lapucelle Tuesday #79
What snappy rejoinder is next? "Dichotomy my ass"? lapucelle Tuesday #81
Exactly the purity test. Emotional polarization. betsuni Tuesday #87
I think "purity test" is a slur aimed at principled protection of marginalized peoples. LuvLoogie Mar 30 #19
100% then what they pass is all republican ideology. Blue Full Moon Mar 30 #23
+1 leftstreet Mar 30 #62
You're right, because there are other "putity tests" that are very real although they don't get that label JHB Tuesday #71
JFC, this better not be an early call for reconciliation without accountablity. intheflow Mar 30 #21
+1000 Celerity Mar 30 #25
+1 leftstreet Mar 30 #61
The one issue that (ALMOST) everyone ignores. The insane concentration of wealth. usonian Mar 30 #24
Yup blue-wave Wednesday #96
Strange Cirsium Mar 30 #26
Ugh Lemon Lyman Mar 30 #27
2012 MTP: shilling for private equity/Romney against Obama Jmg212 Mar 30 #28
I agree with Booker, partially. gab13by13 Mar 30 #31
Democrats "fail" when they get sucked into the divisive purity test bullshit and don't vote "D" in the general election. sop Mar 30 #33
I would argue we have to find a happy middle angrychair Mar 30 #39
Do you believe Republican Senator Mehmet Oz would be better than Fetterman? sop Mar 30 #55
Fetterman's crime angrychair Mar 30 #65
Despite Fetterman's "crime," do you you think Senator Oz would be any better? It's a simple question. sop Mar 30 #66
My pushback is entirely primary angrychair Mar 30 #69
Cory would not be my choice. JBTaurus83 Mar 30 #34
Murphy and Beshear are strong candidates. yellow dahlia Mar 30 #46
We tried that, Corey. His name was Barack Obama. All it proved was that there's no "left-right divide"... JHB Mar 30 #35
best post of the thread harumph Mar 30 #37
The football example! 😎 littlemissmartypants Mar 30 #43
Hard no from me angrychair Mar 30 #36
That's what real leadership looks like. everyonematters Mar 30 #40
Instead of purity tests, how about impurity tests? hay rick Mar 30 #42
What's CB talking about today? What will he do tomorrow? littlemissmartypants Mar 30 #44
There is no issue more important and necessary... Escape Mar 30 #49
I like Booker themaguffin Mar 30 #53
Spoken like a true centrist. Buddyzbuddy Mar 30 #54
Senator Booker isn't a *dreaded* "centrist". Based on his voting record, he's a hard core liberal, lapucelle Tuesday #84
I almost miss "establishment" as a mindless slur because centrist means something and can be verified. betsuni Tuesday #88
I have no personal animosity towards Sen. Booker. Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #89
Yes!!! We need a FIGHTER!!! We need someone to stand on the senate floor speaking for 25 hours ... lapucelle Tuesday #85
"Asked by NBC anchor Kristen Welker MorbidButterflyTat Mar 30 #56
Yup, failed the purity test by saying purity tests are bad. Purity tests turn allies into enemies betsuni Tuesday #72
jfc bigtree Mar 30 #59
What a great idea, Cory. Trash the Democrats rather than the Republicans. Please . . . don't run in 2028. Vinca Mar 30 #63
The Republicans have failed KT2000 Mar 30 #64
Why is it always the democrats who are failing? Trump fucked up big time, so did Mike Johnson. Initech Mar 30 #67
Ugh spanone Mar 30 #68
The primary is absolutely a purity test. Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #90
After reading the comments above, I'm thinking that B.See Wednesday #91
"Closest match in the Primaries"--good way to put it. DFW Wednesday #92
Voting is like getting on a public bus. The bus will never pick you up at your door and drop you Scrivener7 Wednesday #93
Okay. To each his own. I wonder tho, B.See Wednesday #95
It depends on which line in the sand is being violated. For example, if an anti-abortion candidate won a Scrivener7 Wednesday #97
Okay. Then yes, I agree, B.See Wednesday #99
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Booker: Democratic Party ...»Reply #59