Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JHB

(38,211 posts)
22. Link to the actual scientific paper mentioned in the press report
Sat Mar 28, 2026, 01:51 PM
Saturday

Only the Abstract is freely available. The full paper is paywalled.

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c20500
Exploring Spin-State Selective Harvesting Pathways from Singlet Fission Dimers to a Near-Infrared-Emissive Spin-Flip Emitter

Percy Gonzalo, Sifuentes-Samanamud, Adrian Sauer, Aki Masaoka, Yuta Sawada, Yuya Watanabe, Ilias Papadopoulos, Katja Heinze, Yoichi Sasaki, and Nobuo Kimizuka
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2026, XXXX, XXX, XXX-XXX

(all the X's mean it has been published online as an early view, but has not been assigned to a particular volume and issue yet)

Abstract
Singlet fission (SF), a photophysical process generating two triplet excitons from one singlet exciton, has the potential to boost efficiency in photovoltaics and organic light-emitting diodes. Previous studies on energy-level control and intermolecular interactions have identified key factors for maximizing the efficiency of the initial SF process. However, in isothermic/endothermic SF systems, such as tetracene derivatives, the subsequent sensitization process becomes less efficient in the presence of a competing Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) process. Here, we demonstrate that a molybdenum-based near-infrared light-emitting spin-flip emitter serves as a triplet-selective energy acceptor from triplet states of tetracene-based dimers generated by SF. The large energy gap existing between the spin-allowed transitions and the luminescent spin-flip transition of the molybdenum complex allowed efficient exothermic triplet energy transfer (TET) to the spin-flip excited doublet state of the complex while circumventing the FRET from the initially formed tetracene singlet state to the high-energy spin-allowed states of the complex. The quantum yields of the doublet state formation of the molybdenum complex by tetracene-based SF dimers with phenylene, 2,5-methylphenylene, and p-terphenylene bridging units were quantified to be 112 ± 6%, 132 ± 2%, and 128 ± 4%, respectively, in solution. The drop of fluorescence lifetimes of the SF dimers at high concentrations of the molybdenum complex implies energy transfer from exchange-coupled triplet pairs, highlighting the importance of controlling exchange interaction and triplet pair recombination. This work represents a significant step toward developing exciton/photon amplification materials by combining SF materials with transition-metal complexes, advancing the application of SF beyond conventional limitations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

We may not need any stinking oil after all.. [View all] multigraincracker Saturday OP
Someone please explain how this doesn't break the first law of thermodynamics. harumph Saturday #1
it is harnessing a 'second' source of energy, in addition to the solar stopdiggin Saturday #2
Not if it's harnessing solar power, which is infinite as long as we have a source FakeNoose Saturday #7
'solar power' doesn't do anything like 'revising' thermodynamics ... stopdiggin Saturday #30
I have no science background Eddie Haskell 60 Saturday #9
No, that is thermodynamics. mr715 Saturday #18
cool Eddie Haskell 60 Saturday #21
I'm not buying any of this. To start with, there is no such thing as 100% efficency in any realm. flashman13 Saturday #12
The 130% number being bandied about in the article refers to quantum efficiency Shermann Saturday #16
I am always raising my eyebrows James48 Saturday #3
Why? mr715 Saturday #19
It isn't 130% efficient if it is 2 energy harvesting events. mr715 Saturday #4
I discussed this badly misinterpreted wishful thinking case in another thread on the topic. NNadir Saturday #5
No angrychair Saturday #6
Mercury in the exhaust smoke. BidenRocks Saturday #8
That is appalling and dangerous nonsense. When confronted... NNadir Saturday #10
I was just using it as an example angrychair Saturday #28
Again, the question is, did radioactivity from nuclear power plants kill as many people in 70 years as died in the... NNadir Saturday #32
So by your logic angrychair Saturday #33
poster said absolutely nothing of the sort stopdiggin Sunday #39
After coal is burned fly ash has to be disposed of. What goes into the air stays in the air. twodogsbarking Saturday #11
Coal ash has radioactivity and heavy metals IbogaProject Saturday #14
More people have died in coal processing, burning than nuclear. mr715 Saturday #15
Nonsense Disaffected Saturday #24
Coal's main byproduct is CO2 NickB79 Saturday #29
you could not be more completely misinformed - or wrong about a particular subject. stopdiggin Saturday #31
Hanford angrychair Saturday #34
Trade offs for any decision. mr715 Sunday #37
No. They do not. (say differently) stopdiggin Sunday #38
Isn't this a peer review journal? multigraincracker Saturday #13
Its a popsci distillation. mr715 Saturday #17
No. I accessed the paper on which this pop misinformation is based. NNadir Saturday #23
It's not a perpetual motion machine swong19104 Saturday #20
Link to the actual scientific paper mentioned in the press report JHB Saturday #22
The paper if not talking about energy conversion efficiency. Disaffected Saturday #25
Wait!?! H2O Man Saturday #27
Recommended. H2O Man Saturday #26
Violates the first Law of Thermodynamics Smells like BS Melon Sunday #35
Whatever bankrupts the wretched Saudi oligarchs, the better! Initech Sunday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We may not need any stink...»Reply #22