Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

leftstreet

(40,878 posts)

11. So was that the GOP goal?

Reply to tritsofme (Reply #9)

Fri Mar 27, 2026, 12:05 PM

Mar 27

...but structure it in a way that insulates ICE/CBP from future appropriations fights for the remainder of Trump’s term

These House and Senate rules are so confusing and exhausting. You seem to understand it, so why wasn't ICE funding already protected from appropriations fights? Was it originally passed in a different setting?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

After weeks of refusing, Republicans caved to Dem demands to fund DHS without a blank check for ICE and CBP. [View all] bigtree Mar 27 OP

Understand: Republicans have stood with ICE here. Let them run on that!! bucolic_frolic Mar 27 #1

They passed a deal that Patty Murray has been offering for weeks Quiet Em Mar 27 #2

When complaints from top MAGAts started coming in.... SergeStorms Mar 27 #8

Same with Senator Slotkin Kaleva Mar 27 #12

Well deserved bow. Passages Mar 27 #3

Turns out that when the Dems don't cave, good things can happen. I hope leadership remembers this. Fil1957 Mar 27 #4

They thought if they pumped in propaganda Tree Lady Mar 27 #5

Thank you Dems! You have power - the President gets the blame. 617Blue Mar 27 #6

ICE is Greg_In_SF Mar 27 #7

I'm normally very supportive of Schumer, but I have a very different take. This is a terrible outcome. tritsofme Mar 27 #9

So was that the GOP goal? leftstreet Mar 27 #11

This is confusing because it wasn't originally structured this way. tritsofme Mar 27 #15

That makes sense leftstreet Mar 27 #16

ICE is already funded for the next several years Kaleva Mar 27 #13

That's not really the distinction that matters tritsofme Mar 27 #17

Now . . . AverageOldGuy Mar 27 #10

Question- James48 Mar 27 #14

Also, trump/DHS could have funded TSA, but CHOSE not to. themaguffin Mar 27 #18