Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,694 posts)
4. You could try I suppose but this sort of tiered-rate based on deposit amount is pretty entrenched
Wed Mar 25, 2026, 06:15 PM
Wednesday

It's even in the CFPB documentation. As long as the banks accurately disclose the tiers, then do what they promised, and don't discriminate against protected classes (like race, sex, age, etc), this structure is all pretty well-documented as being legal.

Modern tiered‑rate accounts
In the U.S., deposit interest rates were heavily regulated under Regulation Q from the 1930s until the 1980s, but even then banks distinguished between types and sizes of deposits (e.g., large denomination certificates of deposit for institutional or wealthy customers) and paid different rates on them.

Once those caps were dismantled in the late 1970s–1980s, banks quickly formalized what had been informal practice into advertised “tiered‑rate accounts,” where specific balance bands earned different rates; today this structure is standard enough that regulators and legal glossaries treat “tiered‑rate account” as a defined product type.


I agree with you that's it's pretty bullshit, but so many things are when it comes to money and how everything is set up for the rich to get richer

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...»Reply #4