Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hibbing

(10,596 posts)
22. I was slow to realize tax code favors wealth
Wed Mar 25, 2026, 04:17 PM
Wednesday

Just from my little investment accounts I can't believe the breaks I get. Pretty much took my whole adult life to realize this.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

this is correct Henry203 Wednesday #1
It is correct that there is a cap. Ms. Toad Wednesday #4
Yeah, but the billionaire creates jobs, don't he? 3Hotdogs Wednesday #28
There was a arithmetic error in calculating the "billionaire" percentage Ilikepurple Wednesday #29
It is fundamentally wrong to describe the relative burden on the taxpayer as 12.4%, when it isn't. Ms. Toad Wednesday #30
Slightly Misleading ProfessorGAC Wednesday #2
I believe they are referring to a self employed worker, much like the billionaires are. LiberalArkie Wednesday #7
That May Be ProfessorGAC Wednesday #9
Nope. The percentage for a self-employed worker is 11.45. Ms. Toad Wednesday #32
It's the assumption in the wording. haele Wednesday #12
And the employer may reduce the wages in order to cover his/her half of the FICA. erronis Wednesday #13
Yes. Employers' share of FICA is just another component of labor cost. Ilikepurple Wednesday #23
Certainly Possible ProfessorGAC Wednesday #24
15.3% for most of my adult life as a self employed person. progressoid Wednesday #20
Not accurate in the details (albeit generally accurate in broad strokes). Ms. Toad Wednesday #3
What is a self-employed person pay? 12.4% LiberalArkie Wednesday #8
If I am not mistaken a self-employed person pays 12.4% payroll tax; state of stupid Wednesday #17
Maybe so, I had to always pay the full amount. But that is what Murray was referring to when they said 12.4% LiberalArkie Wednesday #26
15.3% - 12.4% for Social Security and 2.9% for Medicare progressoid Wednesday #21
Nope. 11.4514%. Ms. Toad Wednesday #33
I agree with your distinction of a "billionnaire" (wealth) vs. income (wages, taxable gains, etc.) erronis Wednesday #14
We do our best to fluff the rich and trivialize financial disparity Torchlight Wednesday #5
Benefits are also capped Dave says Wednesday #6
Same Page, Except... ProfessorGAC Wednesday #10
I'd treat dividends the same as earned income Dave says Wednesday #18
I Buy That To A Degree ProfessorGAC Wednesday #25
They could uncap the tax until the funds had a 75 year balance. Captain Zero Wednesday #11
That's a thought. Dave says Wednesday #19
If the cap is raised, then the benefits should also be increased MichMan Wednesday #37
I already pointed that out Dave says Wednesday #39
Double it for those making over $180,000.00 multigraincracker Wednesday #15
For 2026 Social Security wages are capped at $184,500 and it rises just about every year ... aggiesal Wednesday #16
I don't understand the reasoning behind creating a donut hole MichMan Wednesday #38
I was slow to realize tax code favors wealth hibbing Wednesday #22
And if you have your own business or are a 1099 contractor, double that rate! SheltieLover Wednesday #27
No. The rate cited IS the rate for self-employed individuals (after reducing their income to 92.35%) Ms. Toad Wednesday #35
Yes, 12 percent taken out dlilafae Wednesday #31
No. 6.2% is taken out for social security. n/t Ms. Toad Wednesday #34
WTF it is going broke time to tax the rich accordingly..... Historic NY Wednesday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MURRAY: Is it true that p...»Reply #22