Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UTUSN

(77,679 posts)
17. I usually try to be clear, so will fix my indirection here. I don't think FILIPKOWSKI is a click-baiter (I only see
Sat Mar 21, 2026, 03:08 PM
Saturday

bits that other DUers post here), but his take grabbed me because of the ongoing frustration about FETTERMAN (like with SINEMA and MANCHIN before) and learning the grew-up-in-a-rich-house and no-job (besides politician, thanks again). My "but" seems to be different from yours, but will leave it to the imagination - so much for my clarifying!

As for "how much a change" - I, too, know nothing about his views before the senatorial run - or really, even during it and now! - but FILIPKOWSKI filled in about how he adopted Bernie's Progressive stances (in preparation for the Senate run? ), so the change is about his current frustration to us.

Somebody else brought up the relitigating suggestion. It never crossed my mind and certainly not now preferring OZ or ever or even replacing FETTERMAN in the primary back then.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Filipkowski explains Fett...»Reply #17