Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dems quietly weighing move to oust Schumer as frustrations boil: report [View all]Fil1957
(698 posts)9. If these were normal times, Schumer would be fine as Democratic leader in the Senate. But we do not live in such times,
and Schumer has been unwilling or unable to adapt. We need a new leader. One who understands the gravity of the situation. One who will fight and call out the Republicans loudly and in strong precise language whenever they do Trump's and the fascists' bidding.
We need a leader with a strategy. Rolling over and surrendering to the Republicans is not a strategy.
Schumer is of a different era. He doesn't understand the gravity of the current moment and never will.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
17 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dems quietly weighing move to oust Schumer as frustrations boil: report [View all]
luv2fly
Friday
OP
A few D legislatures don't want him to lead. A lot of dissatisfaction
Bread and Circuses
Yesterday
#45
Sure. Because Liz Warren, Chris Murphy and Tina Smith are all about that "playschool steering wheel."
Scrivener7
Saturday
#19
If these were normal times, Schumer would be fine as Democratic leader in the Senate. But we do not live in such times,
Fil1957
Saturday
#9
I haven't thought about it much, but Ossoff, Slotkin, Kelly, Warren, Gallego, Sanders would all be a significant
Fil1957
Saturday
#21
He had Nancy to run interference. She was often the one talking, he the one nodding next to her.
Scrivener7
Saturday
#17
"It's not just that you give us something to vote AGAINST, but something to vote FOR!"
W_HAMILTON
Saturday
#11
Chris Murphy would be excellent. You talk as if we have no bench. We have an awesome bench. We need to let them play.
Scrivener7
Saturday
#18
The con artist is the De facto leader of the Senate. Thune is just his puppet.
Quiet Em
Yesterday
#31