General Discussion

LetMyPeopleVote

(179,138 posts)

13. Legal experts alarmed over Pete Hegseth's 'no quarter' statement

Sun Mar 15, 2026, 05:53 PM

Sunday

Hegseth is firing JAG officers and reorganizing the JAG office because he wants to commit war crimes. Hegseth just committed a war crime by promising that "No Quarter" will be given to any enemy of the trump administration

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's offhand remark that the U.S. would show "no quarter, no mercy for our enemies," in Iran.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-03-14T03:00:29Z

https://www.rawstory.com/pete-hegseth-2676101135

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's offhand remark that the U.S. would show "no quarter, no mercy for our enemies," in Iran. In military context, "no quarter" means killing enemy combatants without allowing surrender.

This alarmed legal experts, who warned the statement could constitute a war crime. Even just saying it could count as a violation of international law and U.S. military code, they added.

Wall Street Journal national security reporter Alex Ward flagged the comment as violating international humanitarian law under the Geneva Convention.

Claremont McKenna College professor Jack Pitney cited the Defense Department's own Law of War Manual, which explicitly forbids declaring no quarter will be given. International Crisis Group senior adviser Brian Finucane, a former U.S. government war crimes lawyer, stated that even declaring no quarter constitutes a war crime punishable by up to life imprisonment under the DoD Manual for Military Commissions.

Stanford law professor Tom Dannenbaum confirmed declaring no quarter is prohibited under international humanitarian law and itself amounts to a war crime.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

3 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Hugin Multichromatic raging moderate

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ro Khanna SAYING THIS about Trump's war is a big deal, but...saying it on FOX "NEWS" is an even BIGGER deal. [View all] Miles Archer Sunday OP

republicans have created a threat. framing, dear Ro nt msongs Sunday #1

The only thing I object to is his use of "we" senseandsensibility Sunday #2

I hear you, and without second-guessing him, I will assume he said that because... Miles Archer Sunday #4

That is the crux of it - In broadly general terms jfz9580m Sunday #9

Yes, broad AND general Miles Archer Sunday #16

DURec leftstreet Sunday #3

North Korea was the bigger threat multigraincracker Sunday #5

.... and North Korea actually HAS atomic weapons now---- why is why neither Bush nor Trump attacked them--- Jack Valentino Sunday #17

I was over the dick-wagging years ago. And it is sadly as clear as glass... littlemissmartypants Sunday #6

K&R spanone Sunday #7

Well, this isn't a war for the interests of the United States. David__77 Sunday #8

Correct and simply stated. erronis Sunday #11

Iran was about to take away our freedoms until Trump saved us IronLionZion Sunday #10

Iran is gonna TAKE OUR JOBS Bluetus Sunday #12

Legal experts alarmed over Pete Hegseth's 'no quarter' statement LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #13

He's such a leader! pattyloutwo Sunday #14

MS NOW- The dangerous significance of Pete Hegseth's 'no quarter' Iran war pledge LetMyPeopleVote Sunday #15

As Shea Whigham so famously said in 'Kong: Skull Island'... OldBaldy1701E Monday #18

The smaller the dick, the bigger the stick. usonian Monday #19

Because the GQPs main goal is to create enemies Clouds Passing Monday #20

I'd quibble about on word: we. We didn't Hassler Monday #21

Agreed Six117 Monday #22