General Discussion

Your initial point which I'm not moving away from despite your efforts, dealt with the SCOTUS. I've completely destroyed your agreement on that point even if you cannot or won't admit it. Your insults and attacks are not going to sway me. I've been here in various forms far longer than you have. Not sure what that has to do with the fact that you are horribly wrong on your initial argument.
You're making assertions based on nothing regarding Cannon and numerous other points.

You can post as many links as you choose. Three judges are just that, three which backs up my point that odds are she would not have been chosen if Garland had possessed just a modicum of guts and acted when he should have. You understand one of three odds I hope.

Do you not understand that the immunity ruling was much later than Garlands confirmation? Which means that the SCOTUS ruling came later than when Garland took office. Do you understand the tenets of the immunity decision? Are you arguing that stealing classified documents and staging a coup are normal activities within the description of the duties of the POTUS?

Keep replying and keep posting background info on things. None of changes the fact that your initial assertions are wrong. You're entitled to your own opinions as am I but you're not entitled to your own facts and rewriting history.