Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AZJonnie

(3,581 posts)
17. I would assume those are all referring to uploads to their public sites like Facebook and Instagram
Sat Mar 7, 2026, 01:27 PM
Saturday

or using their tools to either create content from scratch, or their tools to edit your own content you uploaded (which is a type of creation).

And yes, the glasses have other privacy concerns (phones do as well, the glasses just make secret recordings easier), some of them egregious like facial recognition software. I'm not saying they are not problematic, but in the CONTEXT of this lawsuit, the "problem" is the subcontractors viewing other people's material that THEY expected to be private. The subcontractors should not be doing this, that is the privacy concern in play here, I'm pretty sure. Or at least, that's how I took it.

If you're saying you KNOW that the people who are suing are the people recorded surreptitiously, then go ahead then feel free to inform me as to how you know that?

Consider this your opportunity to prove how dumb Claude.ai is

It’s a new U.S. class‑action lawsuit claiming Meta’s Ray‑Ban Meta / Meta AI smart glasses secretly exposed users’ private footage to human reviewers at an overseas subcontractor, despite marketing that strongly implied the footage would stay private

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why does every technological advance always end in people watching more porn and weird bathroom things? Scrivener7 Friday #1
You have to ask? Wounded Bear Friday #5
I suspect this is more about people who DON'T get sex than people who do. Scrivener7 Friday #7
Generally, yes, but not universally...nt Wounded Bear Friday #9
In a strange way this is backwards. Porn has driven many of the technological advances. unblock Friday #8
That is so perfect LearnedHand Friday #2
I saw quite a few people calling users of Meta glasses "glassholes" as well, copying the nickname highplainsdem Saturday #11
Kick SheltieLover Friday #3
Perverted control freak. blm Friday #4
Google glass/2014 cbabe Friday #6
This moniker does not make sense to me AZJonnie Friday #10
The perverts who record them in the first place i guess LearnedHand Saturday #12
You don't have to be a "pervert" or "creep" to record your partner naked/having sex with you in consenting fashion AZJonnie Saturday #15
The perverts are the people who recorded that footage of others without consent. Or are you assuming highplainsdem Saturday #13
It's certainly possible that it was recorded with consent, yes AZJonnie Saturday #14
It's possible, but certainly not guaranteed, that the recording was consensual. But not everyone will highplainsdem Saturday #16
I would assume those are all referring to uploads to their public sites like Facebook and Instagram AZJonnie Saturday #17
I didn't say that those glasses being called pervert glasses is due to the lawsuit. That nickname is highplainsdem Saturday #18
That's what I took you to be implying with your whole argument about my "selective" reading of the contract AZJonnie Saturday #19
I've been very clear about AI companies and AI bros being fundamentally dishonest. Their highplainsdem Saturday #20
So, now the lawsuit is back to being about third-party privacy complaints? AZJonnie Saturday #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People Are Calling Meta R...»Reply #17