Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(22,385 posts)

3. I suppose they could do this with public domain material, such as Shakespeare or Dickens

Sat Mar 7, 2026, 01:12 PM

Saturday

But anything published after 1930, and it's copyright infringement.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 SheltieLover Friday #1

You're welcome! highplainsdem Saturday #2

Casey Newton responds to the story in The Verge: highplainsdem Saturday #5

And Bloomberg's Jason Schreier, also ripped off by Grammarly, responded: highplainsdem Saturday #6

TechCrunch article today on Grammarly ripping off those writers: highplainsdem Saturday #7