I mean, I don't personally see any naked people or people having sex unless it's me and/or my partner, do you?
Meta is facing a new lawsuit over its AI smart glasses and their lack of privacy, after an investigation by Swedish newspapers found that workers at a Kenya-based subcontractor are reviewing footage from customers’ glasses, which included sensitive content, like nudity, people having sex, and using the toilet.
The context seems clear to me by this statement that the users are the ones pissed that their OWN privacy was abridge via the subcontractors viewing their (the users) private content they recorded with their glasses.
And I believe the Meta policy refers to the thing you POST like on Facebook and Instagram. They are informing you that THAT stuff (content that you create, share, post, or upload) is not "private", that it belongs to Meta.
Use of the glasses is a different thing, couples could use them to record themselves having sex, expecting that they would be the only ones that have permission to view that content (that's not a 'post', but it probably does get recorded to the cloud), but the subcontractors have violated that expectation, ergo, THEY are the "perverts".
Though I suppose it's possible someone could like go to a sex club with them on and record others having sex w/o their consent, I'm not saying its impossible to record that kind of content surreptitiously, more clandestinely than they could with a phone. But then I don't see how subcontractors viewing the materials are the proper ones to bust them for doing so. You think there should be a staff of "police" overseeing everything everyone records to find that sort of thing, when the vast majority of people expect their glasses video content to be private?
= new reply since forum marked as read