Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You've probably heard that AI chatbots can completely fabricate quotes. It happened yesterday in a DU thread. [View all]highplainsdem
(61,057 posts)25. Thanks - but I wouldn't have caught it if I hadn't already looked at a number of websites about the story so
I'd known that story ending had to be wrong.
I remember teachers in particular warning three years ago, after ChatGPT was released, that the internet would be polluted by fake citations and quotes and "facts" from chatbots unless whoever got those results already knew the answer and could spot errors immediately (in which case it's unlikely they'd bother using genAI) or they were careful enough to check everything the AI told them - which people using AI to save time will rarely do.
I have been trying hard to get DUers to admit when they're posting anything from a genAI tool. I think it's very unfair not to make that clear, even if the AI user thinks it's correct or has done some checking.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You've probably heard that AI chatbots can completely fabricate quotes. It happened yesterday in a DU thread. [View all]
highplainsdem
Friday
OP
Lol for fun I asked an AI the reason for the discrepancy and gave it the passage from your post
AZJonnie
Friday
#2
Not sure what you mean. It quoted one of my replies in that Science Fiction thread, or it quoted
highplainsdem
Friday
#4
Claude is clueless. There is an actual story. I posted links about it in the earlier thread I linked to. There
highplainsdem
Friday
#9
It's not surprising that it got confused, this entire discussion is extremely circular
AZJonnie
Friday
#13
I would've expected any bot to at least follow the links in both threads, which would have shown that
highplainsdem
Friday
#15
Interesting seeing you try to defend Claude's inane answer, when this thread links to the older thread
highplainsdem
Yesterday
#19
I guess I am, given you don't know what the actual prompt was, yet are arbitrarily coming up with a strawman
AZJonnie
Yesterday
#20
No, the problem using genAI is with genAI and its inherent flaws. Anyone who's ever used genAI should
highplainsdem
14 hrs ago
#27
Obviously I know I don't know nearly as much on this topic as you do, so I generally defer, Sir :)
AZJonnie
Friday
#14
These tools don't just fabricate fiction. They fabricate citations in law and science pieces.
RockRaven
Friday
#6
Yes. I mentioned that in the earlier thread I linked to. I've posted lots of warnings here over the last few years
highplainsdem
Friday
#10
+1. AI is essentially a smooth-talking buzzword-spewing bullshitter with an unlimited capacity for plagiarism
dalton99a
Friday
#12
When ChatGPT became popular, people said AI systems really need to provide sources.
Renew Deal
Yesterday
#24
Thanks - but I wouldn't have caught it if I hadn't already looked at a number of websites about the story so
highplainsdem
14 hrs ago
#25
Yeah, it's getting scary. I posted something I didn't know was AI. I took it down as soon as
mucifer
14 hrs ago
#28