Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thx to you & Goonch SheltieLover Friday #1
Lol for fun I asked an AI the reason for the discrepancy and gave it the passage from your post AZJonnie Friday #2
Not sure what you mean. It quoted one of my replies in that Science Fiction thread, or it quoted highplainsdem Friday #4
I mean it literally sourced from this very thread AZJonnie Friday #7
Claude is clueless. There is an actual story. I posted links about it in the earlier thread I linked to. There highplainsdem Friday #9
It's not surprising that it got confused, this entire discussion is extremely circular AZJonnie Friday #13
I would've expected any bot to at least follow the links in both threads, which would have shown that highplainsdem Friday #15
Claude would have seen this bit, in Goonch's follow-up, which said this: AZJonnie Friday #17
Interesting seeing you try to defend Claude's inane answer, when this thread links to the older thread highplainsdem Yesterday #19
I guess I am, given you don't know what the actual prompt was, yet are arbitrarily coming up with a strawman AZJonnie Yesterday #20
If there was anything close to intelligence in Claude, the highplainsdem Yesterday #21
Why must you insist it's a delusional tangent AZJonnie Yesterday #22
No, the problem using genAI is with genAI and its inherent flaws. Anyone who's ever used genAI should highplainsdem 11 hrs ago #27
And, The Chatbot Is Still Wrong ProfessorGAC Friday #3
+1. It's patent nonsense dalton99a Friday #5
I don't know about that one, Professor :) AZJonnie Friday #8
I'm Going To Say No ProfessorGAC Friday #11
Obviously I know I don't know nearly as much on this topic as you do, so I generally defer, Sir :) AZJonnie Friday #14
Pretty Much ProfessorGAC Friday #16
Can you name a movie in which one person occupied two places at the same time? Orrex 10 hrs ago #29
BTTF Is A Prime Example, Yes ProfessorGAC 7 hrs ago #33
Right, but that's not the same Marty in two places at once Orrex 7 hrs ago #34
Not Getting You ProfessorGAC 7 hrs ago #35
I think we're differing on what qualifies as the "same" person Orrex 6 hrs ago #37
Oh wait. I just caught your bit about "lack of matter available" Orrex 6 hrs ago #38
These tools don't just fabricate fiction. They fabricate citations in law and science pieces. RockRaven Friday #6
Yes. I mentioned that in the earlier thread I linked to. I've posted lots of warnings here over the last few years highplainsdem Friday #10
+1. AI is essentially a smooth-talking buzzword-spewing bullshitter with an unlimited capacity for plagiarism dalton99a Friday #12
Exactly. highplainsdem Yesterday #18
When ChatGPT became popular, people said AI systems really need to provide sources. Renew Deal Yesterday #24
Good catch Renew Deal Yesterday #23
Thanks - but I wouldn't have caught it if I hadn't already looked at a number of websites about the story so highplainsdem 11 hrs ago #25
Yikes. So how do we combat this? It's only going to get worse. Scrivener7 11 hrs ago #26
Yeah, it's getting scary. I posted something I didn't know was AI. I took it down as soon as mucifer 10 hrs ago #28
It's really bad in the political commentary video space Renew Deal 9 hrs ago #31
I suspect AI systems will be like fish farms. cachukis 9 hrs ago #30
I miss the old Google. Hell, I miss the old Alta Vista. haele 8 hrs ago #32
Anyone can make up a quote. GoCubsGo 7 hrs ago #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You've probably heard tha...»Reply #18