Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(61,010 posts)
15. I would've expected any bot to at least follow the links in both threads, which would have shown that
Fri Feb 13, 2026, 05:45 PM
Friday

the story and author were real. Claude doing a search with any search engine would also have shown that it's a real story.

Hell, Anthropic illegally used so many books for training that Claude might've been trained on the story.

I understand how and why "writing" generally, and proper attribution in particular is very near and dear to you


I don't understand why everyone isn't outraged by the theft of the world's knowledge and intellectual property by AI robber barons. What they stole was worth trillions, and everyone involved in the IP theft belongs in prison.

And what's called the AI pollution of our information ecosystem is a catastrophe. GenAI is destroying people's ability to find out what's real and what isn't.

If all the AI bros spent the rest of their lives in prison, and their companies were sued out of existence, it still wouldn't begin to atone for all the harm they've done in just a few years.

And as for coding - one OP I posted about Matt Shumer the other day quoted an article Gary Marcus had linked to, about how unsafe AI-generated code is. It mentioned a survey showed half of developers trust AI coding so much now that they aren't even checking the code. That's a lot of catastrophes waiting to happen.

And then there's AI wrecking education and harming the natural environment...

GenAI is the most harmful tech ever developed, and the stupidest.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thx to you & Goonch SheltieLover Friday #1
Lol for fun I asked an AI the reason for the discrepancy and gave it the passage from your post AZJonnie Friday #2
Not sure what you mean. It quoted one of my replies in that Science Fiction thread, or it quoted highplainsdem Friday #4
I mean it literally sourced from this very thread AZJonnie Friday #7
Claude is clueless. There is an actual story. I posted links about it in the earlier thread I linked to. There highplainsdem Friday #9
It's not surprising that it got confused, this entire discussion is extremely circular AZJonnie Friday #13
I would've expected any bot to at least follow the links in both threads, which would have shown that highplainsdem Friday #15
Claude would have seen this bit, in Goonch's follow-up, which said this: AZJonnie Friday #17
And, The Chatbot Is Still Wrong ProfessorGAC Friday #3
+1. It's patent nonsense dalton99a Friday #5
I don't know about that one, Professor :) AZJonnie Friday #8
I'm Going To Say No ProfessorGAC Friday #11
Obviously I know I don't know nearly as much on this topic as you do, so I generally defer, Sir :) AZJonnie Friday #14
Pretty Much ProfessorGAC Friday #16
These tools don't just fabricate fiction. They fabricate citations in law and science pieces. RockRaven Friday #6
Yes. I mentioned that in the earlier thread I linked to. I've posted lots of warnings here over the last few years highplainsdem Friday #10
+1. AI is essentially a smooth-talking buzzword-spewing bullshitter with an unlimited capacity for plagiarism dalton99a Friday #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You've probably heard tha...»Reply #15