Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(177,198 posts)
3. Judge says Pete Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly over 'illegal orders' video
Thu Feb 12, 2026, 07:35 PM
Thursday

This ruling makes me smile. I am looking forward to reading this opinion

Judge says Pete Hegseth is unlawfully retaliating against Sen. Mark Kelly over ‘illegal orders’ video

https://fascinating.news/r/hRS2CmPg

Fascinating News 🇺🇸 (@fascinating-us.bsky.social) 2026-02-12T17:42:01.123Z

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/12/politics/mark-kelly-pentagon-lawsuit-ruling

A federal judge on Thursday shut down Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s attempts to punish Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly over his urging of US service members to refuse illegal orders, ruling that the Pentagon chief’s actions were unconstitutionally retaliatory.

The decision landed two days after a grand jury in Washington, DC, declined to approve charges sought by federal prosecutors against the Arizona senator and several other Democratic lawmakers who taped a video last year warning that “threats to our Constitution” are coming “from right here at home,” and repeatedly implored service members and the intelligence community to “refuse illegal orders.”

Together, the grand jury declination and ruling from senior US District Judge Richard Leon represent major impediments to efforts by aides of President Donald Trump to use the levers of government to punish Kelly, a retired Navy captain and former astronaut, over his participation in the video.

Leon, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, wrote in a scathing, 29-page ruling that Hegseth was trampling over the First Amendment rights of Kelly and that his moves are an impermissible form of government retaliation.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge grants Mark Kelly a...»Reply #3