Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Wiz Imp

(9,407 posts)

22. Right here:

Reply to WSHazel (Reply #20)

Wed Feb 11, 2026, 11:22 AM

Yesterday

https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/HTML/IF12827.html

At the time of the benchmark revision, estimates of employment changes in the 11 months before and 9 months after March are adjusted proportionately to match the new, more accurate March employment levels by industry.

That means data are revised back 21 months from the present. (April 2024 thru December 2025).

BLS annual benchmark revisions, which have been part of regular BLS employment estimation processes since 1935.

The process has not changed in 90 years.

Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BLS jobs report revises 2025 down to +181,000 total jobs added for the year [View all] Johnny2X2X Yesterday OP

Yet the billionaires Trump sycophants keep artificially inflating the Stock Market. Chasstev365 Yesterday #1

What you're seeing is a total divorce for working people and economic indicators Johnny2X2X Yesterday #3

It's not billionaires doing that, it is us WSHazel Yesterday #4

If you believe this report, UpInArms Yesterday #2

Does this count all the jobs lost? nt leftyladyfrommo Yesterday #5

We need to add 140,000 jobs per month to keep up with population growth Johnny2X2X Yesterday #6

There is no statistical justification for pulling 800,000 jobs out of 2024 WSHazel Yesterday #7

You have no clue what you're talking about Wiz Imp Yesterday #12

Slow your roll WSHazel Yesterday #15

There was a change in how small businesses are calculated EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #16

I get that for the most part WSHazel Yesterday #18

Last time I respond to you but to repeat, you have no clue how the Benchmark revision process works. Wiz Imp Yesterday #21

I understand what the words say WSHazel Yesterday #23

Extremely weak & misleading explanation. Wiz Imp Yesterday #19

Not necessarily. EdmondDantes_ Yesterday #28

Wow! Dunning Kruger in action! Wiz Imp Yesterday #17

Are you being deliberately obtuse? WSHazel Yesterday #20

Right here: Wiz Imp Yesterday #22

Just so we are aware of your position WSHazel Yesterday #25

🙄 Wiz Imp Yesterday #26

One final thing. Wiz Imp Yesterday #27

Not a hard concept WSHazel 18 hrs ago #31

I do not believe we added 130,000 jobs in January 2026 OrlandoDem2 Yesterday #8

That's not a good number Johnny2X2X Yesterday #9

How has unemployment not gone higher? Johonny Yesterday #10

It's risen some, like a half point Johnny2X2X Yesterday #11

Media making it sound like these job numbers Johonny Yesterday #13

These numbers are a total disaster Johnny2X2X Yesterday #14

Because many people, myself included, just stop looking TexasBushwhacker Yesterday #24

MaddowBlog-New report shows 2025 was even worse for U.S. job market than we thought LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #29

I'm old enough to remember Johnny2X2X Yesterday #30