Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Smackdown2019

(1,345 posts)
29. Dont celebrate yet
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 11:37 PM
Tuesday

Grand Juries can keep saying No, just take one Jury to say yes... Trump can keep shopping around...

It doesn't look good, but its a trump world we are in, so nothing surprises me nowadays....

For now, just another hurdle for trump to get a trial on Kelly....

All is Kelly needs to do, is Run for President... then that old saying we use to hear so often.... its an election year....

Run Kelly Run!!!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe now the monster will stop targeting his enemies? vapor2 Tuesday #1
It's just legal harassment! It usually costs money to defend against most charges--- Jack Valentino Tuesday #14
Never. SergeStorms Yesterday #39
Not really a surprise senseandsensibility Tuesday #2
Huge - KABOOM, malaise Tuesday #3
Illegal orders you mean. pwb Tuesday #4
This UTUSN Tuesday #23
They are not going to stop. johnnyfins Tuesday #5
Correct they will keep trying newdeal2 Tuesday #11
That's a relief MustLoveBeagles Tuesday #6
Trump administration fails to secure indictment in connection with Democrats involved in 'illegal orders' video LetMyPeopleVote Tuesday #7
Pirro: brakester Yesterday #37
Ham sandwiches apparently have more criminal tendencies Ocelot II Tuesday #8
Well Duh! What "crime" were they supposed to have committed according to the DOJ? Wiz Imp Tuesday #9
According to the NYT, "interfering with the loyalty, morale or discipline of the U.S. armed forces" muriel_volestrangler Yesterday #30
That is great news! mysteryowl Tuesday #10
That's illegal orders not legal orders WmChris Tuesday #12
This UTUSN Tuesday #24
So Pirro decided to go ahead and make herself look like a drunk fool again mdbl Tuesday #13
She Was Born to the Role The Roux Comes First Tuesday #26
For a small period of time, it looked like she might try to rehab mdbl Yesterday #32
the J6 king himself, whining about "seditious behavior" Skittles Tuesday #15
Good on them canetoad Tuesday #16
Old "Drinky" Jeanine's batting average keeps dropping. LudwigPastorius Tuesday #17
Here's the video of Chris Hayes' announcement: Rhiannon12866 Tuesday #18
Now sue them for 20 Billion dollars! BidenRocks Tuesday #19
YES!!!!!! calimary Tuesday #20
Hooray! mahina Tuesday #21
OMG, we won ONE LilElf70 Tuesday #22
Can the grand jury transcripts be made public? Tasmanian Devil Tuesday #25
Mark Kelly is worth a thousand tRumps. Dave Bowman Tuesday #27
Bondi will try again Mz Pip Tuesday #28
Dont celebrate yet Smackdown2019 Tuesday #29
At least he should be in a good mood next week............ n/t DFW Yesterday #31
Grand Jury Rebuffs Justice Dept. Attempt to Indict 6 Democrats in Congress (NYT Gift Subscription) LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #33
Good Botany Yesterday #34
Excellent! Fuck you Pete Hegseth! Initech Yesterday #35
Refuse ILLEGAL Orders, not Legal MineralMan Yesterday #36
Excellent! ShazzieB Yesterday #38
Fix your post Mysterian Yesterday #40
People over power. And ultimately, we the people KPN Yesterday #41
MaddowBlog-Dems enraged after Trump's DOJ targeted veterans with charges of seditious conspiracy LetMyPeopleVote Yesterday #42
I expected this, given the fact that the Uniform Code of Military Justice states this quite clearly. patphil Yesterday #43
No grand jurors found the Trump DOJ met low probable cause threshold in failed indictment of Democratic lawmakers LetMyPeopleVote 23 hrs ago #44
Deadline Legal Blog-Grand jury's refusal to indict Democrats joins a stunning pattern of DOJ rejections LetMyPeopleVote 6 hrs ago #45
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hayes reporting tha...»Reply #29