Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Jersey Devil

(10,795 posts)
Tue Feb 10, 2026, 10:07 PM 15 hrs ago

"detained for questioning" in Guthrie case? [View all]

CNn and other news sources says a man has been "detained for questioning" but not arrested. But there is no such thing as putting someone in custody to answer questions. I have been a lawyer for 55 years and that included a lot of criminal law and have no idea what they are talking about. Unless someone voluntarily submits to questioning there is no way they can be held in custody unless they are arrested.

43 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
thank you Skittles 15 hrs ago #1
Me too. n/t iluvtennis 13 hrs ago #31
Are the news sources getting this info from Kash Patel? Greywing 14 hrs ago #2
Yeah, ol Cash crossed my mind, too. Cha 14 hrs ago #4
Bingo. The Keystone Cops at work! In an autocratic KPN 12 hrs ago #33
Mahalo, Jersey Devil.. Cha 14 hrs ago #3
Saw it Rebl2 14 hrs ago #5
Let's not pretend like everything always goes by the book. RockRaven 14 hrs ago #6
Sure, but there must be an arrest Jersey Devil 14 hrs ago #13
Did they send ICE? It would be on par for this FBI & WH to totally fuck over Maru Kitteh 14 hrs ago #7
Could be. ShazzieB 12 hrs ago #32
It's Kash's Law! CanonRay 14 hrs ago #8
I call bullshit montanacowboy 14 hrs ago #9
NBC interrupted Olympics coverage TommyT139 14 hrs ago #12
Something about this news report is screwy Jersey Devil 14 hrs ago #14
Absolutely! KPN 12 hrs ago #34
Is it the case TommyT139 14 hrs ago #10
That's a TV show 48 hours gab13by13 14 hrs ago #16
See comment 22. "Quarles exception" TommyT139 13 hrs ago #23
You can't detain someone simply because a life is at risk Jersey Devil 13 hrs ago #29
There is no provision to hold someone to answer questions Jersey Devil 14 hrs ago #17
See comment 22: "Quarles exception" TommyT139 13 hrs ago #24
You cannot be "held for questioning" - it's not a thing at all Prairie Gates 14 hrs ago #20
Talking head on MSNBC TommyT139 13 hrs ago #22
Quarles is an exception to Miranda warnings, not the requirement to arrest someone for questioning Jersey Devil 13 hrs ago #27
That's not what I said TommyT139 13 hrs ago #28
Hopefully this is a good sign Johnny2X2X 14 hrs ago #11
Could you explain what we're supposed to be looking at on your link? Sogo 13 hrs ago #25
meh. i was once 'detained' but not arrested by chgo cops. mopinko 14 hrs ago #15
You were arrested Jersey Devil 14 hrs ago #18
oh i know. i was either arrested or illegally detained. but they insisted i wasnt under arrest. mopinko 14 hrs ago #19
Spunds like they made something up to cover their asses Jersey Devil 13 hrs ago #30
Why would you conflate the ability to sue or the right to a remedy with "cannot be detained without arrest" Ilikepurple 12 hrs ago #35
i talked to a lawyer. mopinko 11 hrs ago #36
Obviously unlawful detention exists. If there was no such thing, we wouldn't need its associated due process right. Ilikepurple 13 hrs ago #21
Terry stop? Jersey Devil 11 hrs ago #37
They're probably detaining him because he's not a citizen. Frasier Balzov 13 hrs ago #26
That could be the answer Jersey Devil 11 hrs ago #38
I think this is cartel activity Melon 11 hrs ago #39
Police release man detained in connection to Nancy Guthrie disappearance muriel_volestrangler 8 hrs ago #40
Totally on brand Kash, you latex knob. Maru Kitteh 48 min ago #43
So you're suggesting that Kash et al malaise 7 hrs ago #41
I did not know this cally 6 hrs ago #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"detained for questioning...