Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EdmondDantes_

(1,497 posts)
70. That's for a civil suit, not a criminal prosecution.
Mon Feb 2, 2026, 09:02 PM
Monday

And even if it wasn't, that still wouldn't have been a consideration in 2016 because there were civil statute of limitations in New York. Florida's law on sex crimes against minors was expanded in 2020 to not have a statute of limitations, but because the claims happened prior to that, statute of limitations would apply and the case would be beyond them I believe.

And then there's that the lawsuit was filed in California which was dismissed for failure to state a proper claim. But since the attacks referenced didn't occur in California, there was no chance of a criminal case being filed there. The suit was later refiled in New York before being dropped. The New York lawsuit was filed by a patent attorney which doesn't lend a lot of credibility given that's not who you would go to for this sort of thing and a good lawyer wouldn't take that case due to inexperience in the field. A divorce lawyer for example shouldn't take a murder case in good conscience for not being able to put forth a good defense.

It's exceedingly unlikely a prosecutor is going to go after a false affidavit in a civil case due to the high bar of proving the lie and intent.

NY law: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/n-y-suspended-its-statute-of-limitations-on-child-sex-abuse-a-flood-of-claims-emerged
Florida law: https://helpingsurvivors.org/statute-of-limitations/florida/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A pedophile and a possible murderer UpInArms Saturday #1
He is complicit. sheshe2 Saturday #3
I don't have information on the little boys and girls, but MLWR Saturday #11
Makes you wonder PuraVidaDreamin Saturday #15
Well with access to the Epstein files..DOJ can blackmail BattleRow Sunday #49
The most serious presidential criminal scandal in U.S. history, and the DOJ is pretending it never happened. sop Saturday #2
They believe they are "his" attorneys UpInArms Saturday #5
And so is Congress and most of the press. Bluetus Saturday #7
It seemed like everyone with any power was terrified to look slightlv Saturday #25
It should be shouted from the rooftops that con-servative starts with a CON. BattleRow Sunday #50
Because the DOJ/FBI was Trumpland, as an article circa 2016 put it. W_HAMILTON Saturday #36
Truth. And let us remember that EVERY FBI director has been a Republican Bluetus Saturday #38
So, so true. BadgerMom Sunday #41
Some Democrats don't seem to understand that elections ... Bluetus Sunday #45
Great ideas. BadgerMom Sunday #46
Co-signed by me also. calimary Sunday #57
Fish rots from the head.... BattleRow Sunday #59
Even more reason to stop letting Republicans stay over as FBI heads when Democrats win the White House. W_HAMILTON Sunday #61
It may be the most serious criminal enterprise anywhere, EVER. Joinfortmill Sunday #52
May I remind everyone, Merrick Garland had these files for 1461 days Bluetus Saturday #4
I've seen it mentioned. But you bring up several interesting points. littlemissmartypants Saturday #10
The reason is that none of this is credible, just like several other.... reACTIONary Saturday #18
Are you saying that the sworn testimony is not credible? Bluetus Saturday #30
Yes, I am saying that the sworen testimony is not credible.... reACTIONary Saturday #32
I agree and I appreciate that you try to keep DU honest. I'm waiting to see if there is more. nt Blasphemer Saturday #33
And what is your basis for making this determination? Bluetus Saturday #34
It can't be prosecuted... reACTIONary Saturday #35
I can see you are one who was perfectly satisfied with Garland's proud recod of service. Bluetus Saturday #37
It is a fundimental injustice... reACTIONary Sunday #39
For the Felon, Justice and rule of law do not apply or haven't you heard the Supreme Court. Buddyzbuddy Monday #64
So, you want to... reACTIONary Monday #66
The Republican party has been running interference Buddyzbuddy Monday #72
So you're mad as hell... reACTIONary Monday #74
I never saw Epstein rape any of his victims but Buddyzbuddy Yesterday #75
To be clear, you're saying there's no evidence because a woman's word is worthless? questionseverything Sunday #42
So the testimony of dozens of women is not credible to you? AllyCat Sunday #44
We are discussing one particular piece of sworn testimony, not.... reACTIONary Sunday #47
Unless they are men. White men. Their sworn testimony and AllyCat Sunday #48
So the FBI should have been sent after Hillary Clinton and Comet Pizza? EdmondDantes_ Sunday #56
Hold that statement. We'll circle back and revisit it when more files drop. It's gonna get a LOT worse. Joinfortmill Sunday #54
While we're reminding people, the DOJ/FBI was/is"Trumpland" and the FBI Director has been a Republican. W_HAMILTON Sunday #53
Here is the list of every FBI director since the beginning. Bluetus Sunday #58
Agree. It stinks to high heaven. bamagal62 Yesterday #76
This is not new. I read this months ago... Grins Saturday #6
The GQP Congress is bringing 2016 USAG Loretta Lynch up before them in their upcoming Epstein hearings AZJonnie Saturday #8
This is a from a party planner that worked for Epstein in regard to the Katie Johnson filing chowder66 Saturday #9
Katie likely withdrew her lawsuit due to threats by Trump/Epstein that if she ever told, she & her family would die. red dog 1 Saturday #14
Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start. Wiz Imp Saturday #24
"Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start. Both are equally likely."?? red dog 1 Sunday #60
A sworn affidavit isn't worth much especially in civil cases EdmondDantes_ Monday #65
"The Katie Johnson story is almost certainly past the statute of limitations so a sworn affidavit is exceedingly red dog 1 Monday #67
That's for a civil suit, not a criminal prosecution. EdmondDantes_ Monday #70
My reply was about the statute of limitations for a civil suit. red dog 1 Monday #71
That's not helping the matter EdmondDantes_ Monday #73
OMG somaticexperiencing Saturday #12
The affidavit is dated 2016 - where has it been all this time? FakeNoose Saturday #13
I guarantee that the right wing media will blame Biden for this. progressoid Saturday #16
It's been all over the internet for the past 10 years. Wiz Imp Saturday #22
And what about the 12 year old that "disappeared" progressoid Saturday #17
What 12 year old that disappeared? Wiz Imp Saturday #23
From the deposition. progressoid Saturday #26
Thank you! Wiz Imp Saturday #28
What about all the little girls and boys marched out in the dead of night slightlv Saturday #27
Does anyone think this will bother.... SergeStorms Saturday #19
Kick dalton99a Saturday #20
Everybody since Monica knows to keep the dress dickthegrouch Saturday #21
The other 12 year old girl was named Maria, gab13by13 Saturday #29
Somebody here is trying hard to discredit this Buddyzbuddy Saturday #31
It'a all gonna come out. All. Of. It. I'm not sure how, but it will all come out. Joinfortmill Sunday #55
I agree. red dog 1 Monday #69
Which proves they used threats as intimidation. malthaussen Sunday #40
What about Ghislane Maxwell's new statement neohippie Sunday #43
And, that may not be the worst of it. Get ready 'cause one way or the otherr, the files will be released. Joinfortmill Sunday #51
Not to be overly picky, but DFW Sunday #62
Thanks for that correction. red dog 1 Monday #68
K&R UTUSN Sunday #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ruben Gallego on Epstein ...»Reply #70