General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ruben Gallego on Epstein witness: "This is sworn testimony under oath. The DOJ needs to answer for it." [View all]Buddyzbuddy
(2,302 posts)I'm just a layman but part of the problem with prosecuting T.... was due to B.S. policies that didn't seem to apply to Hillary Clinton. But the Felon played on those policies to the 10th degree. I hate to rehash the same crap because there is so much of it, so for brevity, I will only highlight.
During the Obama administration, their was tremendous evidence of the Felons collusion with Russia. Investigation and pursuit of prosecution stopped due to policy (too close to election)
Epstein case was fixed from the inside (Acosta) abundance of evidence hidden, not pursued and shutdown as a fesult of a sweetheart deal.
Emoluments clause- violated but not adjudicated
Congress chose not to pursue all possible charges for the impeachment hearings for purposes of simplicity and expediency.
Upon departure from the Whitehouse the former President chose to steal classified documents for which he was indicted but was allowed to escape justice by a politically biased Federal Judge.
Jan. 6 riots were instigated by the Felon along with election interference. The investigation was delayed, resulting in a delayed prosecution hindered further by a politically biased Supreme Court bent on helping the Felon who took advantage of a flawed justice system and pursued a third election like his life dependent on it.
The victims in the Epstein case were child victims, scared to begin with and then threatened directly or indirectly with threats to family members. And then revictimized by people who aren't satisfied with "just" an accusation if they don't provide a video or some other proof of a threat from a person who has proven himself to be fully capable of such a threat.
Ask Stormy Daniel's or everybody that the Felon is trying to lock up because he feels injured by them.
IS THAT THE JUSTICE YOUR TALKING ABOUT?