Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Count Off [View all]

canetoad

(20,769 posts)
6. Thank you for this post
Mon Feb 2, 2026, 12:48 AM
Feb 2

I've assumed from the start that if the DOJ follows the ruling to release ALL the files, they are going to obfuscate and bury those that may contain pertinent details.

I get a feeling that internet sleuths worldwide accept this as fact and we can rely on different groups/organisations or media to do their own analysis of certain aspects of the files.

If the DOJ thinks that folk will be overwhelmed by the sheer number of inconsequential files, they have not factored in the persistence of internet researchers who HATE trump with a vengeance and will put in the hours and research to find incriminating evidence on him.

If Bondi's DOJ is as inept, undisciplined and uncommitted as most other aspects of this administration are, all we need to do is give the researchers time to piece the bits together.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Count Off [View all] H2O Man Feb 1 OP
There better be Watergate style hearings/trial on national livetohike Feb 1 #1
Coming soon malaise Feb 1 #3
Right! H2O Man Feb 2 #5
At the latest, H2O Man Feb 1 #4
If even one tenth of what has been released is true Saoirse9 Feb 1 #2
Yes. H2O Man Feb 2 #7
Yes it makes sense Saoirse9 Feb 2 #11
Right. H2O Man Feb 2 #12
Thank you for this post canetoad Feb 2 #6
A serious question: H2O Man Feb 2 #8
Ooooh, that would have hurt canetoad Feb 2 #9
Thank you! H2O Man Feb 2 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Count Off»Reply #6