Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Count Off [View all]
Former AG Denise Georges Allegations Against Gov. Bryan, Others Surface in Latest DOJ Epstein Release
Newly released USDOJ records include an FBI interview in which former VI AG Denise George describes alleged political pressure, Epstein-related decisions, estate negotiations, and claims by a confidential informant regarding campaign-related donations.
https://viconsortium.com/vi-federal/virgin-islands-former-ag-denise-george-s-allegations-against-gov--bryan--others-surface-in-latest-doj-epstein-release
A DOJ spokesperson initially said the three million documents released were from the six million they evaluated for release. Within hours, it was said there were 200,000 still unreleased. Even those who do not find match fascinating can recognize that the difference between three million and 200,000 unreleased documents is the exact number of lies the DOJ is currently telling the American public.
In conversations with friends and associates yesterday, the issue of what is important in the released Epstein Pedo Files kept coming up. In any investigation, there is a difference between raw information and documented evidence. This is true for your local police and prosecutor investigating and prosecuting a crime, to the intelligence agencies of the countries that Epstein served. Thus, while the texts between Steve Bannon and Epstein making fun of the felon may be entertaining, the only thing they document is that even two fucking creeps viewed him as an ass clown.
In almost every investigation, it is important to recognize that it includes interviews with a variety of people who may or may not be relied upon to tell what they are convinced is the truth. Obviously, jailhouse snitches are usually only focused on their own potential benefits. Co-conspirators always have reasons to lie. Witnesses against a thug may include other criminals who are less than attractive individuals.
When interviewing potential victims, it is essential to be respectful. Creeps like Epstein target vulnerable individuals, and they carry scars. The emotional damage Epstein & Fiends inflicted on girls remains intense. At the same time, serious investigation sometimes draw people who make fantastic claims, like moths to a flame. They may honestly believe what they are saying is true, or they may be trying to discredit an investigation, as we saw recently.
The interview with Denise George is solid evidence of how expansive the criminal network that Epstein operated in actually was. The article I linked documents that as the Attorney General of the Virgin Islands, she filed a serious case that exposed wide-spread corruption linked with Epstein's operations there. The governor was extremely mad, and called her to yell about going after people who are members of our team. Of course she was fired immediately after she filed her case.
Wouldn't it be nice if our team continued to pressure the DOJ to release the documentation from Denis George's investigation, including the actual indictment she filed? And how about the files of the Miami Beach police? They were prepared to charge and convict at very least Epstein. They were furious when the DOJ took over the case, and gave Epstein and apparently twenty others besides Maxwell sweetheart deals? Deals that another court overturned, before going after Epstein and Maxwell?
It's almost like the other team can't be trusted.
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies