Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Reuben Gallego on Epstein witness: "This is sworn testimony under oath. The DOJ needs to answer for it." [View all]Wiz Imp
(9,227 posts)24. Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start.
Both are equally likely. By the way, the only involvement of Lisa Bloom in this lawsuit seems to be that it was her who called the press conference just before the election in 2016 that was subsequently cancelled. "Katie Johnson's" (not her real name) main attorney was Thomas Meagher.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/
For the New York case, Doe was represented by a New Jersey patent attorney, Thomas Meagher, who later confirmed to news outlets that his client was the same person who filed the Johnson claims. By then, a widely shared video of a woman identified as Johnson, shown with a pixelated face and disguised voice, accompanied press coverage of her case.
Numerous journalists, advocates and political operatives had attempted to get, or had been promised, in-person access to Johnson. These promises never panned out. Steve Baer, a conservative mega-donor whose extensive email contacts helped to push the claims, for example, told Jezebel that he never met the accuser in person, despite many attempts.
Only one outlet, the now defunct millennial-targeting site Revelist, scored any sort of interview with the accuser. In July 2016, after first being promised an in-person meeting by Meagher, Revelist's Emily Shugerman had to settle for a conference call that left her questioning whether Johnson really existed. "I don't know if the Katie Johnson I spoke to is the same girl who Trump allegedly raped in 1994, or if that girl even exists," she wrote.
The next month, Lisa Bloom, a prominent attorney known for fighting high-profile sexual abuse cases, helped organize and publicize a news conference at which Johnson was to appear and outline her allegations against Trump. But the accuser backed out at the last minute, leaving "a room full of waiting reporters," as Vox described, without answers and dropped the New York case days later.
Numerous journalists, advocates and political operatives had attempted to get, or had been promised, in-person access to Johnson. These promises never panned out. Steve Baer, a conservative mega-donor whose extensive email contacts helped to push the claims, for example, told Jezebel that he never met the accuser in person, despite many attempts.
Only one outlet, the now defunct millennial-targeting site Revelist, scored any sort of interview with the accuser. In July 2016, after first being promised an in-person meeting by Meagher, Revelist's Emily Shugerman had to settle for a conference call that left her questioning whether Johnson really existed. "I don't know if the Katie Johnson I spoke to is the same girl who Trump allegedly raped in 1994, or if that girl even exists," she wrote.
The next month, Lisa Bloom, a prominent attorney known for fighting high-profile sexual abuse cases, helped organize and publicize a news conference at which Johnson was to appear and outline her allegations against Trump. But the accuser backed out at the last minute, leaving "a room full of waiting reporters," as Vox described, without answers and dropped the New York case days later.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Reuben Gallego on Epstein witness: "This is sworn testimony under oath. The DOJ needs to answer for it." [View all]
red dog 1
Saturday
OP
The most serious presidential criminal scandal in U.S. history, and the DOJ is pretending it never happened.
sop
Saturday
#2
It should be shouted from the rooftops that con-servative starts with a CON.
BattleRow
14 hrs ago
#50
Even more reason to stop letting Republicans stay over as FBI heads when Democrats win the White House.
W_HAMILTON
9 hrs ago
#61
I've seen it mentioned. But you bring up several interesting points.
littlemissmartypants
Saturday
#10
I agree and I appreciate that you try to keep DU honest. I'm waiting to see if there is more. nt
Blasphemer
Saturday
#33
I can see you are one who was perfectly satisfied with Garland's proud recod of service.
Bluetus
Saturday
#37
To be clear, you're saying there's no evidence because a woman's word is worthless?
questionseverything
17 hrs ago
#42
So the FBI should have been sent after Hillary Clinton and Comet Pizza?
EdmondDantes_
14 hrs ago
#56
Hold that statement. We'll circle back and revisit it when more files drop. It's gonna get a LOT worse.
Joinfortmill
14 hrs ago
#54
While we're reminding people, the DOJ/FBI was/is"Trumpland" and the FBI Director has been a Republican.
W_HAMILTON
14 hrs ago
#53
The GQP Congress is bringing 2016 USAG Loretta Lynch up before them in their upcoming Epstein hearings
AZJonnie
Saturday
#8
This is a from a party planner that worked for Epstein in regard to the Katie Johnson filing
chowder66
Saturday
#9
Katie likely withdrew her lawsuit due to threats by Trump/Epstein that if she ever told, she & her family would die.
red dog 1
Saturday
#14
"Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start. Both are equally likely."??
red dog 1
9 hrs ago
#60
It'a all gonna come out. All. Of. It. I'm not sure how, but it will all come out.
Joinfortmill
14 hrs ago
#55
And, that may not be the worst of it. Get ready 'cause one way or the otherr, the files will be released.
Joinfortmill
14 hrs ago
#51