Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Reuben Gallego on Epstein witness: "This is sworn testimony under oath. The DOJ needs to answer for it." [View all]Wiz Imp
(9,227 posts)22. It's been all over the internet for the past 10 years.
Last edited Sat Jan 31, 2026, 08:42 PM - Edit history (3)
This is not anything remotely new.
Article from Snopes fromJune 23, 2016 here:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/
excerpt here referring to the Tiffany Doe "testimony" that Gallego refers to:
A federal lawsuit filed in New York accuses Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump of repeatedly raping a 13-year-old girl more than 20 years ago, at several Upper East Side parties hosted by convicted sex offender and notorious billionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein.
The suit, first reported by the Real Deal, accuses Trump and Epstein of luring the anonymous plaintiff and other young women to four parties at Epstein's so-called Wexner Mansion at 9 East 71st Street. Epstein allegedly lured the plaintiff, identified in the suit only as Jane Doe, with promises of a modeling career and cash.
Another anonymous woman, identified in additional testimony as Tiffany Doe, corroborates Jane's allegations, testifying that she met Epstein at Port Authority, where he hired her to recruit other young girls for his parties. Trump had known Epstein for seven years in 1994 when he attended the parties at Wexner, according to the suit. He also allegedly knew that the plaintiff was 13 years old.
Jane Doe filed a similar suit in California in April, under the name Katie Johnson, also accusing Trump and Epstein of rape. That suit was dismissed on the grounds of improper paperwork the address affiliated with her name was found to be abandoned. Today's suit confirms that the plaintiffs are one and the same.
The suit, first reported by the Real Deal, accuses Trump and Epstein of luring the anonymous plaintiff and other young women to four parties at Epstein's so-called Wexner Mansion at 9 East 71st Street. Epstein allegedly lured the plaintiff, identified in the suit only as Jane Doe, with promises of a modeling career and cash.
Another anonymous woman, identified in additional testimony as Tiffany Doe, corroborates Jane's allegations, testifying that she met Epstein at Port Authority, where he hired her to recruit other young girls for his parties. Trump had known Epstein for seven years in 1994 when he attended the parties at Wexner, according to the suit. He also allegedly knew that the plaintiff was 13 years old.
Jane Doe filed a similar suit in California in April, under the name Katie Johnson, also accusing Trump and Epstein of rape. That suit was dismissed on the grounds of improper paperwork the address affiliated with her name was found to be abandoned. Today's suit confirms that the plaintiffs are one and the same.
I have no idea why he's jumping on this now when it has been completely public for 10 years.
Note, there are strong reasons to doubt the authenticity of the "plaintiff" in this lawsuit. It may be true, but nobody should just automatically assume it as such.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Reuben Gallego on Epstein witness: "This is sworn testimony under oath. The DOJ needs to answer for it." [View all]
red dog 1
Saturday
OP
The most serious presidential criminal scandal in U.S. history, and the DOJ is pretending it never happened.
sop
Saturday
#2
It should be shouted from the rooftops that con-servative starts with a CON.
BattleRow
14 hrs ago
#50
Even more reason to stop letting Republicans stay over as FBI heads when Democrats win the White House.
W_HAMILTON
9 hrs ago
#61
I've seen it mentioned. But you bring up several interesting points.
littlemissmartypants
Saturday
#10
I agree and I appreciate that you try to keep DU honest. I'm waiting to see if there is more. nt
Blasphemer
Saturday
#33
I can see you are one who was perfectly satisfied with Garland's proud recod of service.
Bluetus
Saturday
#37
To be clear, you're saying there's no evidence because a woman's word is worthless?
questionseverything
17 hrs ago
#42
So the FBI should have been sent after Hillary Clinton and Comet Pizza?
EdmondDantes_
14 hrs ago
#56
Hold that statement. We'll circle back and revisit it when more files drop. It's gonna get a LOT worse.
Joinfortmill
14 hrs ago
#54
While we're reminding people, the DOJ/FBI was/is"Trumpland" and the FBI Director has been a Republican.
W_HAMILTON
14 hrs ago
#53
The GQP Congress is bringing 2016 USAG Loretta Lynch up before them in their upcoming Epstein hearings
AZJonnie
Saturday
#8
This is a from a party planner that worked for Epstein in regard to the Katie Johnson filing
chowder66
Saturday
#9
Katie likely withdrew her lawsuit due to threats by Trump/Epstein that if she ever told, she & her family would die.
red dog 1
Saturday
#14
"Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start. Both are equally likely."??
red dog 1
9 hrs ago
#60
It'a all gonna come out. All. Of. It. I'm not sure how, but it will all come out.
Joinfortmill
14 hrs ago
#55
And, that may not be the worst of it. Get ready 'cause one way or the otherr, the files will be released.
Joinfortmill
14 hrs ago
#51