Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Wiz Imp

(9,227 posts)
22. It's been all over the internet for the past 10 years.
Sat Jan 31, 2026, 08:08 PM
Saturday

Last edited Sat Jan 31, 2026, 08:42 PM - Edit history (3)

This is not anything remotely new.

Article from Snopes fromJune 23, 2016 here:
https://www.snopes.com/news/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/

excerpt here referring to the Tiffany Doe "testimony" that Gallego refers to:

A federal lawsuit filed in New York accuses Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump of repeatedly raping a 13-year-old girl more than 20 years ago, at several Upper East Side parties hosted by convicted sex offender and notorious billionaire investor Jeffrey Epstein.

The suit, first reported by the Real Deal, accuses Trump and Epstein of luring the anonymous plaintiff and other young women to four parties at Epstein's so-called Wexner Mansion at 9 East 71st Street. Epstein allegedly lured the plaintiff, identified in the suit only as Jane Doe, with promises of a modeling career and cash.

Another anonymous woman, identified in additional testimony as Tiffany Doe, corroborates Jane's allegations, testifying that she met Epstein at Port Authority, where he hired her to recruit other young girls for his parties. Trump had known Epstein for seven years in 1994 when he attended the parties at Wexner, according to the suit. He also allegedly knew that the plaintiff was 13 years old.

Jane Doe filed a similar suit in California in April, under the name Katie Johnson, also accusing Trump and Epstein of rape. That suit was dismissed on the grounds of improper paperwork — the address affiliated with her name was found to be abandoned. Today's suit confirms that the plaintiffs are one and the same.

I have no idea why he's jumping on this now when it has been completely public for 10 years.

Note, there are strong reasons to doubt the authenticity of the "plaintiff" in this lawsuit. It may be true, but nobody should just automatically assume it as such.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2024/09/03/trump-epstein-katie-johnson/

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A pedophile and a possible murderer UpInArms Saturday #1
He is complicit. sheshe2 Saturday #3
I don't have information on the little boys and girls, but MLWR Saturday #11
Makes you wonder PuraVidaDreamin Saturday #15
Well with access to the Epstein files..DOJ can blackmail BattleRow 14 hrs ago #49
The most serious presidential criminal scandal in U.S. history, and the DOJ is pretending it never happened. sop Saturday #2
They believe they are "his" attorneys UpInArms Saturday #5
And so is Congress and most of the press. Bluetus Saturday #7
It seemed like everyone with any power was terrified to look slightlv Saturday #25
It should be shouted from the rooftops that con-servative starts with a CON. BattleRow 14 hrs ago #50
Because the DOJ/FBI was Trumpland, as an article circa 2016 put it. W_HAMILTON Saturday #36
Truth. And let us remember that EVERY FBI director has been a Republican Bluetus Saturday #38
So, so true. BadgerMom 17 hrs ago #41
Some Democrats don't seem to understand that elections ... Bluetus 16 hrs ago #45
Great ideas. BadgerMom 16 hrs ago #46
Co-signed by me also. calimary 13 hrs ago #57
Fish rots from the head.... BattleRow 11 hrs ago #59
Even more reason to stop letting Republicans stay over as FBI heads when Democrats win the White House. W_HAMILTON 9 hrs ago #61
It may be the most serious criminal enterprise anywhere, EVER. Joinfortmill 14 hrs ago #52
May I remind everyone, Merrick Garland had these files for 1461 days Bluetus Saturday #4
I've seen it mentioned. But you bring up several interesting points. littlemissmartypants Saturday #10
The reason is that none of this is credible, just like several other.... reACTIONary Saturday #18
Are you saying that the sworn testimony is not credible? Bluetus Saturday #30
Yes, I am saying that the sworen testimony is not credible.... reACTIONary Saturday #32
I agree and I appreciate that you try to keep DU honest. I'm waiting to see if there is more. nt Blasphemer Saturday #33
And what is your basis for making this determination? Bluetus Saturday #34
It can't be prosecuted... reACTIONary Saturday #35
I can see you are one who was perfectly satisfied with Garland's proud recod of service. Bluetus Saturday #37
It is a fundimental injustice... reACTIONary Yesterday #39
To be clear, you're saying there's no evidence because a woman's word is worthless? questionseverything 17 hrs ago #42
So the testimony of dozens of women is not credible to you? AllyCat 16 hrs ago #44
We are discussing one particular piece of sworn testimony, not.... reACTIONary 16 hrs ago #47
Unless they are men. White men. Their sworn testimony and AllyCat 15 hrs ago #48
So the FBI should have been sent after Hillary Clinton and Comet Pizza? EdmondDantes_ 14 hrs ago #56
Hold that statement. We'll circle back and revisit it when more files drop. It's gonna get a LOT worse. Joinfortmill 14 hrs ago #54
While we're reminding people, the DOJ/FBI was/is"Trumpland" and the FBI Director has been a Republican. W_HAMILTON 14 hrs ago #53
Here is the list of every FBI director since the beginning. Bluetus 11 hrs ago #58
This is not new. I read this months ago... Grins Saturday #6
The GQP Congress is bringing 2016 USAG Loretta Lynch up before them in their upcoming Epstein hearings AZJonnie Saturday #8
This is a from a party planner that worked for Epstein in regard to the Katie Johnson filing chowder66 Saturday #9
Katie likely withdrew her lawsuit due to threats by Trump/Epstein that if she ever told, she & her family would die. red dog 1 Saturday #14
Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start. Wiz Imp Saturday #24
"Or the lawsuit was withdrawn because it was BS from the start. Both are equally likely."?? red dog 1 9 hrs ago #60
OMG somaticexperiencing Saturday #12
The affidavit is dated 2016 - where has it been all this time? FakeNoose Saturday #13
I guarantee that the right wing media will blame Biden for this. progressoid Saturday #16
It's been all over the internet for the past 10 years. Wiz Imp Saturday #22
And what about the 12 year old that "disappeared" progressoid Saturday #17
What 12 year old that disappeared? Wiz Imp Saturday #23
From the deposition. progressoid Saturday #26
Thank you! Wiz Imp Saturday #28
What about all the little girls and boys marched out in the dead of night slightlv Saturday #27
Does anyone think this will bother.... SergeStorms Saturday #19
Kick dalton99a Saturday #20
Everybody since Monica knows to keep the dress dickthegrouch Saturday #21
The other 12 year old girl was named Maria, gab13by13 Saturday #29
Somebody here is trying hard to discredit this Buddyzbuddy Saturday #31
It'a all gonna come out. All. Of. It. I'm not sure how, but it will all come out. Joinfortmill 14 hrs ago #55
Which proves they used threats as intimidation. malthaussen 17 hrs ago #40
What about Ghislane Maxwell's new statement neohippie 16 hrs ago #43
And, that may not be the worst of it. Get ready 'cause one way or the otherr, the files will be released. Joinfortmill 14 hrs ago #51
Not to be overly picky, but DFW 6 hrs ago #62
K&R UTUSN 6 hrs ago #63
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reuben Gallego on Epstein...»Reply #22