Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flvegan

(65,566 posts)
30. Based on my own selfish entertainment, I'd say "no" simply because
Fri Dec 5, 2025, 02:27 AM
6 hrs ago

I find it terrifically amusing (and somewhat disappointing) that an obvious AI slop video from some BS YouTube monetized nonsense account will get absolutely Rec'd to the moon. Even after several DU'ers (thank you folks) will point out that it's AI slop, the incoming comments and Recs continue, because why bother to read the thread/feedback? Why question if it's even real to begin with? Why spend 10 seconds Google/DDG searching for a like news posting somewhere? The AI slop then spreads, shared on Facebook, TikTok or whatever other brainrot central gathering one chooses.

It's like watching one of those videos of an iced over highway. There's a 20 car pileup, lights, blinkers, hazards are all on, people are waving and shouting to slow down, yet here comes another dozen vehicles at full speed right into the pileup.

Also "fun" is watching the DU homepage, with the video posting down the right side when it looks like a bad National Enquirer feed.

I'm not questioning nor saying anything negative about the way the site is run or moderated. AI is what it is, and it's not a violation of the TOS on its face in many circumstances, I guess.

I just re-read this, and maybe "no" was the wrong answer, now that I think of it.

*wink*

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not alerted - but somehow clearly identified - maybe with a color identifier as with videos, etc? NewHendoLib Wednesday #1
changed my vote from yes... ret5hd Wednesday #6
I agree, identification is better than alerting synni 5 hrs ago #31
Based on WHAT?? It is in no way a violation of site rules. Jack Valentino Wednesday #2
But it should be. paleotn Wednesday #4
NO. Jack Valentino Wednesday #5
That's it! Just so no to fakes. paleotn Wednesday #7
It's unreliable. One expert after another has said that chatbots are built in such a way that they tell you what you eppur_se_muova Yesterday #18
Alerted on for what? Renew Deal Wednesday #3
Why not? 3825-87867 Wednesday #8
I think a better question is whether AI posts should be a violation of the TOS. Scrivener7 Wednesday #9
I voted yes, but agree with u berniesandersmittens Wednesday #10
Yes, definitely. Scrivener7 Wednesday #11
Its a context thing. Eventually the AI bubble will burst but... FascismIsDeath Wednesday #12
Definitely no womanofthehills Wednesday #13
Is the 3rd option written by AI? Kaleva Wednesday #14
LOL mr715 Wednesday #16
Thank you for picking up on that ! :D At first, I tried to write an AI-sounding post which I thought would capture ... eppur_se_muova Yesterday #19
I don't know to be honest Niagara Wednesday #15
How does anyone feel comfortable posting AI slop under their own name? hunter Wednesday #17
Labelled KentuckyWoman Yesterday #20
Isn't that like asking whether YouTube videos or links to Twitter posts should be a violation of the terms of service? meadowlander Yesterday #21
Actually yes, theoretically no? jfz9580m Yesterday #22
This is a confusing question jfz9580m Yesterday #23
We need to push back against AI, but with a caveat... carpetbagger 8 hrs ago #24
One issue i see is people spamming the board with some slop video with no context in the body fujiyamasan 7 hrs ago #25
I think it's EarlG's call canetoad 7 hrs ago #26
If the AI-created content violates the TOS - yes. Ms. Toad 7 hrs ago #27
Well, I'm open to it, but it should be clearly clarified as being modified, etc. Just like photographs, videos, etc. SWBTATTReg 6 hrs ago #28
I'm up for it. usonian 6 hrs ago #29
Based on my own selfish entertainment, I'd say "no" simply because flvegan 6 hrs ago #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should AI-created content...»Reply #30