Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

JohnnyRingo

(20,353 posts)
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 08:49 PM Yesterday

I was wondering why that admiral so willingly showed the video to congress. [View all]

It obviously shows a murder in full detail. One that someone is ultimately responsible for.

Then I thought back to Hegseth saying kill them all. He seemed quite proud of the decision.
Then he learned that it was a very real war crime, one that will be over his head for life. He would not be able to leave the country lest he may be arrested.

So all of a sudden he changed it to claim the admiral in charge made the decision to kill them but he supported him fully.

When asked why he was watching the attack in real time and, as the commanding officer, didn't stop the 2nd strike, he said he didn't see the two survivors. That throws it back to the admiral again. Hegseth was told to produce the video and he stalled then refused.

Now Admiral Scapegoat himself brings it in for Congress to decide for themselves if Hegseth would have missed seeing those two survivors.
By all accounts he could not have missed it so the responsibility goes back up to Secretary Talk Show.

I think the best metaphor here is someone caught a hot potato.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I was wondering why that ...