Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ol Janx Spirit

(529 posts)
24. Finland and Iceland are already positioned to take advantage of this kind of technology...
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 10:55 AM
Yesterday

...with much more use of geothermal energy and the infrastructure to support it. The U.S. not so much.

But I bet some version of this does happen in many blue--and even red--states.

We just tend to use electricity for heating and cooling, so finding ways to convert the waste heat into electricity is the challenge here.

And, this is not actually a reliably red versus blue issue as we would like to think:

South Dakota--which hasn't voted for a Democrat in a presidential election since 1964--leads the nation in renewable energy production, with 92% of its electricity coming from renewable sources as of 2024.
https://www.sdnewswatch.org/fact-brief-south-dakota-wind-solar-clean-energy-production/#:~:text=South%20Dakota%20is%20ranked%20No,and%20Kansas%20third%20(74%25).

Note that "Iowa is second (83%) and Kansas third (74%)".

When you drive across Kansas to get to blue Colorado it is actually striking how many wind turbines there are between the billboards for Jesus and anti-abortion screeds in that very red state.

Will the Maniacal Orange Menace hate it? Yes. But I still don't think that will stop progress--because it really hasn't so far....

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Interesting but I doubt it will happen here only because it sounds expensive newdeal2 Yesterday #1
If it adds a nickel of cost to the opium dreams of AI developers, it will never happen. hatrack Yesterday #2
Excellent true words! chouchou Yesterday #19
And if it additionally drmeow 18 hrs ago #40
NIMBY modrepub Yesterday #8
Unless they charge users for the heat and/or energy Auggie Yesterday #13
Here in the AZ borderlands, where people face drilling deeper well to reach lowering, disappearing water table Attilatheblond Yesterday #22
Finland has a centralized network of underground pipes to distribute steam (geothermal).... pat_k 18 hrs ago #41
Finland's underlying granite is home to lots of infrastructure. thought crime 16 hrs ago #46
Yeah, it makes way too much sense. sop Yesterday #3
Never work in the USA - it it's not making a profit it is dead on arrival. walkingman Yesterday #4
Yeah. This would save on heating costs. Trump only applegrove Yesterday #6
BINGO! OldBaldy1701E Yesterday #9
What about all the data centers in the South? Ursus Rex Yesterday #5
An argument for moving data centers to Alaska or more densely populated cold places in the "snowbelt." pat_k 17 hrs ago #42
This is a nice thing OnionPatch Yesterday #7
Please explain how that helps the fossil fuel industry. JohnnyRingo Yesterday #10
Are you talking to me? It doesn't help the fossil fuel industry. applegrove Yesterday #11
I was being sarcastic. JohnnyRingo Yesterday #12
Sorry. I get it now. I didn't think you were a troll applegrove Yesterday #14
I was being sarcastic again. JohnnyRingo Yesterday #17
LOL! applegrove Yesterday #18
Well, I for one knew where you were coming from in the first few words. Cheers! erronis Yesterday #16
It takes huge amounts of Electricity popsdenver 22 hrs ago #37
Of course it helps the fossil fuel industry... NewLarry Yesterday #26
Rec jfz9580m 17 hrs ago #45
And when they finally figure out the data centers are worthless and shut them down? erronis Yesterday #15
Putting them underground also helps with noise and space constraints IronLionZion Yesterday #20
Thank You Or Posting This! Rendville Yesterday #21
Trump would have his peons bomb the place. twodogsbarking Yesterday #23
Finland and Iceland are already positioned to take advantage of this kind of technology... Ol Janx Spirit Yesterday #24
Yeah, he'll call them underground wind mills or some such shit. RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Yesterday #25
I don't know. Sounds kind of "woke" to me. If it's not coal, Trump isn't interested. Vinca Yesterday #27
Acushnet Process Company, which started making Titleist golf balls, used to heat the building in the winter from...... usaf-vet Yesterday #28
Yes computers were huge back in the day. applegrove Yesterday #29
WWBOD? - What Would Big Oil Do? JoseBalow Yesterday #30
Good one! calimary 12 hrs ago #47
Inefficient use of a wasteful process's leftovers. marble falls Yesterday #31
Inefficient use is better than no use at all. Shipwack Yesterday #34
Trump doesn't have to make this illegal. In most of the country we can't do this at all. jmowreader Yesterday #32
Reminds me of the Minnesota Supercomputer Center GopherGal Yesterday #33
Fa geta bout it! This is only possible when you have government oversight and an educated populace. flashman13 23 hrs ago #35
Silly me popsdenver 22 hrs ago #36
Considering that the U.S. is 29 times the size of Finland, I'm pretty sure this is a problem of scale, and not ancianita 20 hrs ago #38
If would probably. work in large cities if there were still large tenements. LiberalArkie 20 hrs ago #39
District heat networks? In America you pay to have your data-center heat delivered in a truck. paulkienitz 17 hrs ago #43
Given the places it would make sense, seems to me it's a great "blue state" (subset: snowbelt) initiative. pat_k 17 hrs ago #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bet ya Trump will make th...»Reply #24