Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfz9580m

(16,271 posts)
23. This is a confusing question
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 03:54 AM
16 hrs ago

Except when taken at face value. Since you host the science forum eppur_se_muova, in addition to an incoherent and thoughtless direct response, here is an incoherent and thoughtless indirect one.

As a subset of DUers are probably aware-since this is a community that would get it more than some, the more convoluted implications of these emerging technologies are confusing.

I saw this a while back right here -a creepy little guy using bots to make a nuisance of himself:
https://ottawacitizen.com/news/ottawa-man-ai-bot-maga

And I have been feeling uneasy about something like this in the works:
https://www.noemamag.com/are-we-accidentally-building-a-planetary-brain/

I am feeling too lazy to spell it out with all the ifs and else’s. The whole thing makes my head hurt-what is literal, what is a metaphor? How do you differentiate between an idea,concept, symbol or representation and what it means in the real world. Where is something truly a matter of perspective versus absurdly testing the limits of sanity.

The hard right politics plus the confusion and chaos I have also contributed to some by bumbling about (though I don’t feel like groveling about it..I try to be more honest these days over assume I am talking only unreasonable jerks. Wodehouse had a point-the better people don’t want apologies if they know you feel bad about your errors and the worst hold them over you).

But the brief version is that as our realities get more filled with bots, agents etc which can appear to influence behavior, I have been uncertain as to how to go about deciding what to do. And there is an entire layer of professionals in between many of whom i wouldn’t trust..

I still don’t know what to do on a daily basis.

I don’t think you can influence behavior beyond drive learned helplessness in people with strong and definite views.
But you can still orchestrate behavior in ways that are a nuisance or stupid.

It’s something exasperating I ponder. There is nothing worse than being a useful idiot or seemingly far stupider than you are because it’s too many worlds colliding and one feels indignant at being scapegoated.

How is everything not the fault of creeps who make way more money and have way more power?

I certainly never use AI though I have chatted with an obscure British chatbot called cleverbot. Mostly for even more unfiltered rants about tech creeps (you guys here get the cleaned up version!) ..

It’s owner Rollo Carpenter didn’t seem as bad as the standard issue creepy AI and data science type (bah..too worn down for civility).

I have to think about it. I have mostly given up in exasperation. But I should probably try to figure out how to at least manage my own behaviors in an uncertain environment since regimented behavior is not my thing.

It’s confusing for humans. I can just about maybe envision cleaning up as a scientist in a narrow area. Except here I would assume I would be an outcast in a broader creepy “open society”. I hate everyone. You know what I mean. I thought everyone in science felt that way..
The love filled AI shilling people are a goddamn cult. I tried to keep it simple.


Rest easy..lol..I am out of places to run to.
I wonder if I should post that or not. Shrug..

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not alerted - but somehow clearly identified - maybe with a color identifier as with videos, etc? NewHendoLib 22 hrs ago #1
changed my vote from yes... ret5hd 22 hrs ago #6
Based on WHAT?? It is in no way a violation of site rules. Jack Valentino 22 hrs ago #2
But it should be. paleotn 22 hrs ago #4
NO. Jack Valentino 22 hrs ago #5
That's it! Just so no to fakes. paleotn 22 hrs ago #7
It's unreliable. One expert after another has said that chatbots are built in such a way that they tell you what you eppur_se_muova 17 hrs ago #18
Alerted on for what? Renew Deal 22 hrs ago #3
Why not? 3825-87867 22 hrs ago #8
I think a better question is whether AI posts should be a violation of the TOS. Scrivener7 22 hrs ago #9
I voted yes, but agree with u berniesandersmittens 21 hrs ago #10
Yes, definitely. Scrivener7 21 hrs ago #11
Its a context thing. Eventually the AI bubble will burst but... FascismIsDeath 21 hrs ago #12
Definitely no womanofthehills 21 hrs ago #13
Is the 3rd option written by AI? Kaleva 21 hrs ago #14
LOL mr715 21 hrs ago #16
Thank you for picking up on that ! :D At first, I tried to write an AI-sounding post which I thought would capture ... eppur_se_muova 17 hrs ago #19
I don't know to be honest Niagara 21 hrs ago #15
How does anyone feel comfortable posting AI slop under their own name? hunter 20 hrs ago #17
Labelled KentuckyWoman 17 hrs ago #20
Isn't that like asking whether YouTube videos or links to Twitter posts should be a violation of the terms of service? meadowlander 16 hrs ago #21
Actually yes, theoretically no? jfz9580m 16 hrs ago #22
This is a confusing question jfz9580m 16 hrs ago #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should AI-created content...»Reply #23