Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cmmngrnd

(30 posts)
7. No evidence of anything "sour" - 5 things to consider
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 01:10 AM
Thursday

The claim in the source article at This Will Hold (TWH) is that the vote totals jumped from 148,853 at 99.4% reporting to 179,899 at 100%, indicating some kind of ballot stuffing or vote dumping of about 31,000 votes. There is no evidence for this claim.

I do not offer this rebuttal to say that Republicans are not cheating elections. They are already doing so through legislation, specifically gerrymandering and legal barriers to voting. I offer this to try to see clearly what is and isn't happening in elections to give Republicans an unfair advantage. I do not feel it helpful for Democrats to have unsubstantiated vote-flipping or ballot stuffing conspiracy theories mirroring the same conspiracy theories we derided when put forward by Republicans.

1. TWH does not offer any evidence for their claim. They show one graphic from NBC showing a vote total of 179,889 but do not show a timeline of when votes were reported. A timeline is needed to show the jump from 148,853 to 179,899. They also show a graphic of voter turnout (x-axis) vs vote percent by party (y-axis) for only one county. This graph shows that when voter turnout increases, the Republicans do better. This does not have any bearing on the primary claim regarding the 31,000 votes. (Note: It actually makes sense that in a region where Republican registration outnumbers Democratic, the more people that vote means the vote totals mirror the registration totals. )

2. DDHQ, a cited source in the article, does not offer evidence for the claim. The numbers presented were taken from the Decision Desk Headquarters (DDHQ). The only graphic shows 179,899 votes with ">95%" reporting. There is no timeline, which again is needed to show the 31,000 vote jump.

3. The local Democratic party has observers during the entire voting process. They observe polling stations during early voting, during same day voting, and during mail in ballot acceptance and counting. These people are deeply familiar with Tennessee law and voting processes. If they are not raising alarms, then there are likely no alarms to raise. It is unlikely that people not intimately affiliated with the local elections are going to find any anomalies the Democrats on site missed. The Shelby County elections commission site has a great explainer of the voting process from start to finish.

4. Per Tennessee law, all elections are subject to audit as a routine part of the process, and Democrats participate in the audit process. The selection of what is audited is random, which makes it harder to hide cheating. (Note: This appears to be a standard procedure nationally. I know we do the same in Florida.)

5. There is no motivation for the local Republican party to violate Tennessee law and make national news. This is a heavily gerrymandered district in a reliably Republican state. As much as Behn outperformed past elections, there was little risk to the Republicans that they would lose a fair election. They had no need to cheat.

Recommendations

11 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Good luck proving it. Something sure is sour. CaliforniaPeggy Wednesday #1
Every time I have voted here, this is what happens: SheltieLover Wednesday #2
In Illinois, there is a drawing to determine the ballot order. murielm99 Thursday #4
Yes I know. Spent most of my life in the Chgo burbs SheltieLover Thursday #5
Work to change the laws? murielm99 Thursday #6
Not me. SheltieLover Thursday #10
This again iemanja Thursday #3
No evidence of anything "sour" - 5 things to consider cmmngrnd Thursday #7
Thanks!!! reACTIONary Thursday #9
The Republican was ahead by 15 points iemanja Thursday #11
That shift was because the most heavily blue district (Nashville) took the longest to count and report. TheRickles Thursday #26
They had no need to cheat. NJCher Thursday #13
A timeline isn't needed. It's simple math. First they say only 1800 votes left then it jumps up LymphocyteLover Thursday #17
No evidence of a 31,000 vote jump cmmngrnd Thursday #19
Idk about the OPs claim but I was tracking NYTs county results and they had it at more than 95% reporting even tho SSJVegeta Thursday #22
yes, I agree with the idea that these media sites likely have imperfect counts LymphocyteLover Thursday #31
I mean they often report based on percentage of precincts reporting. SSJVegeta Thursday #33
The claim of 148,853 votes tallied with 99.4% reporting is in the black DDHQ graphic at the top LymphocyteLover Thursday #32
I don't see it FBaggins Thursday #34
Gotcha. My bad. I was focusing on the votes and not the % LymphocyteLover Friday #39
No it's not. Wiz Imp Thursday #36
Yes, my bad LymphocyteLover Friday #40
Thank you! TheRickles Thursday #27
Jeeze, not this shit again. reACTIONary Thursday #8
You're going to get NJCher Thursday #14
Every county in TN 7 uses some form of paper ballot cmmngrnd Thursday #21
Well that's awkward for the conspiracy theories EdmondDantes_ Thursday #25
I'm sure she'll be self deleting now iemanja Thursday #29
I read they bought touchscreens with huge paper rolls that record the voters selections questionseverything Thursday #35
Partially Correct cmmngrnd Friday #38
Shelbe Co. uses paper ballots, so... reACTIONary Thursday #23
This message was self-deleted by its author iemanja Thursday #28
They dont actually know how many ballots are left. Sometimes there are more than they think. Sometimes less. SSJVegeta Thursday #12
We lost Greg_In_SF Thursday #15
This Will Hold has become BlueAnon, pushing CT election denialism far too often. If Kari Lake was a Dem, she'd lead it. Celerity Thursday #16
Link? NJCher Thursday #18
the attacks are the logical implications of the This Will Hold claims, I already stated that clearly in my reply Celerity Thursday #24
This is why I keep conspiracy bananas on the counter Sympthsical Thursday #20
Was Elon around? travelingthrulife Thursday #30
This Will Hold has zero credibility Wiz Imp Thursday #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something Is Sour In Tenn...»Reply #7