Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

womanofthehills

(10,669 posts)
13. Definitely no
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:09 PM
15 hrs ago

Lots of info on AI. I have found so much info I never see on the web.

I have 2 friends who had breast implants removed because of “breast implant illness” - tens of thousands in Facebook “breast implant group. “

I find out on AI in the late 80’s /90’s 400,000 women sued Dow Chemical for $4 billion dollars for breast implant illness.Over $100 million were compensated I NEVER ever knew of this!!

That’s something that was kept quiet so they could put in implants again and ruin women’s health. The evil part is -Dow contributed to the new studies saying - all’s well - we made new studies so you can’t take us to court again.

My grandaughter is on methadone- it’s messing with the veins in her legs. Drs have NO clue. AI tells me the methadone creates histamine which can mess with her small veins. Why did no doctor know this???

So much info on AI!! Never take first answer as good - question deeper and disagree with AI to find info deeper into the web. You can’t take ask AI for references - so why is that different from any other search.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not alerted - but somehow clearly identified - maybe with a color identifier as with videos, etc? NewHendoLib 16 hrs ago #1
changed my vote from yes... ret5hd 16 hrs ago #6
Based on WHAT?? It is in no way a violation of site rules. Jack Valentino 16 hrs ago #2
But it should be. paleotn 16 hrs ago #4
NO. Jack Valentino 16 hrs ago #5
That's it! Just so no to fakes. paleotn 16 hrs ago #7
It's unreliable. One expert after another has said that chatbots are built in such a way that they tell you what you eppur_se_muova 11 hrs ago #18
Alerted on for what? Renew Deal 16 hrs ago #3
Why not? 3825-87867 16 hrs ago #8
I think a better question is whether AI posts should be a violation of the TOS. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #9
I voted yes, but agree with u berniesandersmittens 15 hrs ago #10
Yes, definitely. Scrivener7 15 hrs ago #11
Its a context thing. Eventually the AI bubble will burst but... FascismIsDeath 15 hrs ago #12
Definitely no womanofthehills 15 hrs ago #13
Is the 3rd option written by AI? Kaleva 15 hrs ago #14
LOL mr715 15 hrs ago #16
Thank you for picking up on that ! :D At first, I tried to write an AI-sounding post which I thought would capture ... eppur_se_muova 10 hrs ago #19
I don't know to be honest Niagara 15 hrs ago #15
How does anyone feel comfortable posting AI slop under their own name? hunter 14 hrs ago #17
Labelled KentuckyWoman 10 hrs ago #20
Isn't that like asking whether YouTube videos or links to Twitter posts should be a violation of the terms of service? meadowlander 10 hrs ago #21
Actually yes, theoretically no? jfz9580m 10 hrs ago #22
This is a confusing question jfz9580m 9 hrs ago #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should AI-created content...»Reply #13