Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flashman13

(1,844 posts)
64. None of this alters the fact that it was an illegal order. The commander in the field was obligated to say no.
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 02:10 PM
15 hrs ago

They could have court marshaled that commander, but I doubt that they would. Why? Because the court would have to establish what order was refused. The commander's defense would have shown that the order was illegal under a number of different laws and regulations and why the commander was obligated not to carry out the order. Next question, who issued the illegal order ? The finger would have pointed straight up the chain of command to Hogsbreath and Trump. It's going to arrive at their doorstep now anyway.

It is a little known fact, but there really were a significant number of German soldiers that refused to commit murder or carry out other illegal orders. None of them were ever court marshaled. Why? Because the court would have had to establish what order was illegal. Theoretically the German army was governed by the Geneva Conventions which prohibits murder. No one in the chain of command would have wanted to be fingered for issuing a criminal order. Deniability was a big thing for them. As the war ground on and loss looked more inevitable, commanders didn't want to risk prosecution. Even the upper echelons of the SS tried to cover up their crimes.

I do believe and hope that this may have embolden field commanders to refuse clearly illegal orders.

These are my thoughts. Feel free to disagree.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well. This could get interesting. mwmisses4289 Tuesday #1
I'm joining you eShirl Tuesday #6
The buck stops with Trump - he is guilty of cold blooded murder. Blues Heron Tuesday #2
T💩p is also responsible for at least 500,000 dead Americans due to his Covid-19 BULLSHIT! OMGWTF Tuesday #18
Yes but pinning responsibility to markodochartaigh Tuesday #27
All people involved with that war crime Jerry2144 Tuesday #3
Oh no, can't do that Stardust Mirror Tuesday #45
the guy who wanted to shoot civilians in the legs? eShirl Tuesday #4
yep KS Toronado Tuesday #23
Miles Taylor was on Thom Hartmann today. markodochartaigh Tuesday #28
Oops! That's not going to sit well with Hegseth and Trumpkins. MineralMan Tuesday #5
What's funny is it's the first day for the knew compliant Pentagon Press Core. underpants Tuesday #8
Exactly. MineralMan Tuesday #9
We'll get more "fake news" comments. KS Toronado Tuesday #24
Well uh "direct" and "directing" can mean different things... underpants Tuesday #25
Trump was bragging he's going to do more strikes on land orangecrush Tuesday #32
Check F'ing Mate purr-rat beauty Tuesday #7
Wonder who's gonna take the fall for this.... Nittersing Tuesday #10
Karoline Leaveitt just gave General Bradley all the credit. dixiegrrrrl Tuesday #41
So they flat out admitted to a war crime? MarineCombatEngineer Tuesday #11
Bradley knew better - not off the hook lame54 Tuesday #12
Here's Bradley's Wikipedia bio Zorro Tuesday #14
I'm not sure Bradley was involved. louis-t 16 hrs ago #63
Get him in front of a microphone lame54 14 hrs ago #65
Anyone else here that used to play "Hot Potato" as a kid? Midnight Writer Tuesday #13
Lol! Dave Bowman Tuesday #31
There's a blast out of the past! Permanut Tuesday #34
Oh Yeah! Ilsa Yesterday #58
Kingsley's Pentagon career is over. sop Tuesday #15
He'll get fired before the day is over. CanonRay Tuesday #16
She Tanuki Tuesday #20
So now rambler_american Tuesday #17
I'll volunteer for free KS Toronado Tuesday #29
Drastic way to distract from Epstein BOSSHOG Tuesday #19
Yes, a "drastic distraction" indeed! n/t Another Jackalope Tuesday #53
Whoa, Pentagon! Calling out the Cha Tuesday #21
Hegseth and Trump have lost control. DoD is acting independently. paleotn Tuesday #22
They are pushing back because clearly Hegseth and Trump were trying to scapegoat Bailey drray23 Tuesday #51
LOL!! She looked so smug with her answer.... Sogo Tuesday #26
Was she smug because she was defying her handlers or doing their bidding? Ilikepurple Tuesday #40
Miller has to be at the top Traildogbob Tuesday #30
As I recall trump can't be prosecuted for anything he does as the president per the Supreme Court. Biophilic Tuesday #33
Can he pardon Hegseth? highplainsdem Tuesday #39
I don't see why not. He seems to be able to pardon everyone else. Biophilic Tuesday #43
Yep that's the plan thought crime Tuesday #50
I heard that he can pardon Pete. nt Ilsa Yesterday #59
He can, just 2 times as hard uponit7771 Tuesday #56
So they lied? Permanut Tuesday #35
Pentagon confirms that Trump and Hegseth are issuing illegal orders nakocal Tuesday #36
Well there it is. sheshe2 Tuesday #37
BOOM is right! 2MuchNoise Tuesday #44
Watching more about it on Ari's show. sheshe2 Tuesday #48
Want to see what REAL soldiers . . . not drunk woman-chasers . . . do when confronted with war crimes? AverageOldGuy Tuesday #38
Hegsbreath renaming defense to WAR shows intent! BidenRocks Tuesday #42
So, now will House and Senate rethugs STILL do NOTHING about this? bluestarone Tuesday #46
Duh, malaise Tuesday #47
LOCK THEM UP NameAlreadyTaken Tuesday #49
trump said I don't know kacekwl Tuesday #52
*Some people* find it unfortunate that there was no 'second strike' in Jack Valentino Tuesday #54
This admin is hot ass garbage uponit7771 Tuesday #55
What a surprise. B.See Tuesday #57
Pete and all the military officers involved must be court-martialed ecstatic Yesterday #60
The finger pointing begins. But we know Trump and Hegseth are liars. surfered 16 hrs ago #61
Ooh, get ready for fireworks! With emphasis on "fire." Martin68 16 hrs ago #62
None of this alters the fact that it was an illegal order. The commander in the field was obligated to say no. flashman13 15 hrs ago #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pentagon confirms Trump a...»Reply #64