Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

beyondtimes

(23 posts)
59. This is from the department of war manual
Mon Dec 1, 2025, 09:17 PM
Monday

As far as military exigencies permit, after each naval engagement, all possible measures
should be taken without delay to search for and collect the wounded, sick, and shipwrecked, and
to recover the dead.70
13.3.5 Surrender by Enemy Vessels. The general rules on the protection of persons hors
de combat, including the rule prohibiting the attack of persons who have surrendered, also apply
to enemy vessels.71
In particular, it is forbidden to make an enemy vessel the object of attack if
it has genuinely, clearly, and unconditionally surrendered, in circumstances in which it is feasible
to accept such surrender.72
Once an enemy vessel has clearly indicated a readiness to surrender, the attack must be
discontinued.73
Indicia of surrender by vessels may include:
• hauling down her flag;
• hoisting a white flag;
74
• surfacing (in the case of submarines);
75
• stopping engines and responding to the attacker’s signals;
76 or
70 Refer to § 7.4.1 (GWS-Sea Obligation Regarding the Search, Collection, and Affirmative Protection of the
Wounded, Sick, Shipwrecked, and Dead).
71 Refer to § 5.9.3 (Persons Who Have Surrendered).
72 2007 NWP ¶8.6.1 (“It is forbidden, however, to target an enemy warship or military aircraft that in good faith
unambiguously and effectively conveys a timely offer of surrender.”); 1955 NWIP ¶511c (“It is forbidden to refuse
quarter to any enemy who has surrendered in good faith. In particular, it is forbidden either to continue to attack
enemy warships and military aircraft which have clearly indicated a readiness to surrender or to fire upon the
survivors of such vessels and aircraft who no longer have the means to defend themselves.”).
73 2007 NWP 1-14M ¶8.6.1 (“Once an enemy warship has clearly indicated a readiness to surrender, such as by
hauling down her flag, by hoisting a white flag, by surfacing (in the case of submarines), by stopping engine

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah, he's fucked, alright. Bondi will prosecute him to the full extent of whatever Trump wants. rsdsharp Monday #1
No one expects that. But his command authority is crippled Mr.WeRP Monday #2
Plus, supposedly, there is an actual audio recording of Kegsbreath giving the ok to murder MarineCombatEngineer Monday #5
Do you think canetoad Monday #20
It's possible MustLoveBeagles Monday #28
This needs to happen MustLoveBeagles Monday #27
Seems to me they are blaming it on Admiral Bradley Farmer-Rick Yesterday #76
Trump got impeached twice. How did that work out? rsdsharp Monday #10
It will look to history like markodochartaigh Monday #40
AS LONG AS ROBERTS AND THE MAGA RULE RVN VET71 Yesterday #73
IOW, a slap on the wrist. joshdawg Monday #9
They'll just come up with an extremely narrow definition of "shipwrecked". nt bbernardini Monday #3
Yes, like Robinson Crusoe ananda Monday #23
Uhh.. Firing on shipwrecked people is the textbook definition of a war crime.. Litterally 18.3.1.1 LiberalArkie Monday #26
Thanks. Nt lostnfound Monday #53
Totally NOT fucked John Coktosten Monday #4
Well, consider this scenario Bluetus Monday #13
I want you to be correct! John Coktosten Monday #22
Attacking Democrats? MineralMan Monday #41
Yes, yes John Coktosten Monday #63
Attacking Democrats is against DU's TOS. nt Wednesdays Monday #66
Post removed Post removed Yesterday #68
That's why we must elect a different kind of Democrat Bluetus Monday #47
Now that I agree with! John Coktosten Monday #62
What disgusting comments. MorbidButterflyTat Monday #60
Right back at ya buddy. John Coktosten Monday #61
I think many are missing this potential outcome Mr.WeRP Monday #43
We didn't have to wait long. Several hours ago, the WH acknowledged Bluetus Monday #49
So it is agreed. Frank Bradley, come on down ... under the bus Bluetus Monday #67
Yes, it's murder GAtomboy Monday #55
Who's going to do anything about it? maxsolomon Monday #6
I suspect liberalgunwilltravel Monday #11
All the NAZI soldiers, officers and commanders popsdenver Monday #14
do something like what? quit and go public? maxsolomon Monday #16
No They Won't RobinA Monday #18
Why does your comment incluse advertising? For winter hats and razors in particular? FadedMullet Monday #32
The admiral Boo1 Monday #56
Admiral Bradley is a helo pilot pfitz59 Yesterday #72
I dont think so Boo1 Yesterday #74
If I was the Traitor-in-Chief, I would be looking for a new "Secretary of War Crimes." lastlib Monday #7
https://www.justsecurity.org/125948/illegal-orders-shipwrecked-boat-strike-survivors/ Sailingdiver Monday #8
Good post, thanks. canetoad Monday #24
Thanks for this info Bayard Monday #25
Thanks for this info MustLoveBeagles Monday #30
They don't want anyone left timms139 Yesterday #69
I'll believe he's fucked swong19104 Monday #12
Defense: "It was a BOAT, not a SHIP!" N/T ColoringFool Monday #15
TickTock, you rotten drunken beast. Joinfortmill Monday #17
The admin is hitting peak record territory with Torchlight Monday #19
and who will defend this? NJCher Monday #42
In a normal world Bettie Monday #21
Throw his ass in the drunk tank Blue Owl Monday #29
"Yeah, he's fucked, alright. Bondi will prosecute him to the full extent of whatever Trump wants." J_William_Ryan Monday #31
I think you missed the somewhat sarcastic point there. thesquanderer Monday #64
"Firing on shipwrecked people is the textbook definition of a war crime." J_William_Ryan Monday #33
Yeah, he was stupid but that's his default setting and has been all along Warpy Monday #34
The guys that took Figarosmom Monday #35
If this had to happen at all, I'm glad it happened after that ridiculous convo they called last month FakeNoose Monday #36
This message was self-deleted by its author Kablooie Monday #37
It's cute that Tribe thinks laws and rules apply to the GOP. 617Blue Monday #38
nothing Tribe said NJCher Monday #44
Trump's law firm, formerly known as the DOJ, will do nothing. Lonestarblue Monday #39
"Hi honey, how was work today?" "Oh, I killed a couple of injured people clinging to a bombed boat." RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Monday #45
When we are no longer Dan Monday #46
A Fascist nightmare. nt Justice matters. Yesterday #71
Kick dalton99a Monday #48
That thump I heard COL Mustard Monday #50
ANGH, sorry. n/t flvegan Monday #51
Now he will have real motivation to help trump intefere with the elections SamuelTheThird Monday #52
WWll - Executed for firing on/killing shipwreck survivors Norrrm Monday #54
arrest him and ship him to venezuela to face murder charges moonshinegnomie Monday #57
Finnegan's Wake struggle4progress Monday #58
This is from the department of war manual beyondtimes Monday #59
Trump has already pardoned all concerned. Marcuse Monday #65
Shhhhh...don't tell anyone.... COL Mustard Yesterday #70
Why does anyone think these laws or regulations matter? BlueTsunami2018 Yesterday #75
If Trump pardoned him it wont pardon UCMJ cpamomfromtexas Yesterday #77
Ultimately, we need to prosecute everyone who ordered or executed the order. It is clearly in violation of military law 33taw Yesterday #78
In Army basic training in 1981, we received training classes to refuse illegal orders Mysterian Yesterday #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Lawrence Tribe on how fuc...»Reply #59