Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(59,226 posts)
28. GenAI is always hallucinating, not reasoning, not aware of what it regurgitated. But some of its
Fri Nov 28, 2025, 05:19 PM
Friday

hallucinations look more rational than others.

It's never reliable, which is why the TOS advise users of that and try to shift legal liability for plagiarism, etc., to users. That unreliability is why genAI tools have not been as widely adopted by paying customers as the AI companies had hoped, so theu're losing incredible amounts of money and we have a bubble with companies kept afloat by venture capitalists and circular financing...and more and more AI companies are saying they want the federal government to assume the financial risks, because they know it's a bubble.

If you've been following much of the news about genAI, you should be well aware that the AI companies expected to be sued, because they knew they were breaking IP laws all along. They still hoped to get away with the theft.

It isn't and never will be "just a tool." GenAI is an illegally trained and fundamentally unethical tool, and all the rationalizations in the world won't make your decision to use it, if you aren't being forced to do so, any more ethical. Karma would have you lose most of what you own - and with the thieves, or someone who benefited from the theft, trying to justify your loss and their gain.

But I wouldn't wish that kind of loss on you or anyone else, even though you're showing zero concern for all the people whose IP was stolen by AI robber barons.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The new paradigm is minimal editorial oversight... Wounded Bear Friday #1
That figure shouldn't have gotten past anyone who wasn't blind. Including the author. highplainsdem Friday #5
No argument here...nt Wounded Bear Friday #6
I'd be looking hard at the reviewers SheltieLover Friday #2
AI reviewers? KT2000 Friday #3
"Peers" of the author, apparently nilram Friday #13
Famous author: dalton99a Friday #4
Vocational ! College of Press ! and Publishing ! ... just the sort of place you'd expect to be doing autism research. eppur_se_muova Friday #12
"...it went through two rounds of review from two independent peer reviewers." LudwigPastorius Friday #7
Just the thing Bobby Brainworm can wave around as proof he was right about everything. tanyev Friday #8
Anyone looking to ANY dot-com for reliable information needs education Maru Kitteh Friday #9
Holy crap -- look at the "m"(?) in "frymblal" -- it's the weirdest typo ever. eppur_se_muova Friday #10
It is not cromulent because of inadequately embiggened research and review. yonder Friday #15
🤣 tanyev Friday #19
Now we're talking! yonder Friday #26
from Gemini ( Google AI ) lapfog_1 Friday #11
Why post AI results? Gemini can get things wrong as well. Please don't post AI slop here. highplainsdem Friday #16
AI slop? lapfog_1 Friday #18
If you use generative AI even though it's trained on stolen intellectual property, you're acting unethically. highplainsdem Friday #21
so the problem is not that it is "slop" but that it works really well lapfog_1 Friday #27
GenAI is always hallucinating, not reasoning, not aware of what it regurgitated. But some of its highplainsdem Friday #28
The entire internet is slop? Cirsium Saturday #37
most of the content of the internet is not original thought lapfog_1 Saturday #38
Sad Cirsium Saturday #40
Am adding "AI sleuths" to my lifelong list of Annoying Irritants (AI) - UTUSN Friday #14
You've seen people asking if something from a mainstream news source is AI? Asking about it here highplainsdem Friday #20
Yea, at DU at least once, a month ago. The other, irritating latest one was UTUSN Friday #31
Where's the latest one, the one you find irritating? highplainsdem Friday #32
The undeniable one I self deleted as soon as the sleuth found out. UTUSN Friday #33
UTUSN, you just uncovered more stuff being done by the person creating fake Obama videos earlier! highplainsdem Friday #34
You have *way* *far* deeper grip on the whole subject than I will ever have - or *want*! UTUSN Friday #35
There's so much of this deepfake type garbage on YouTube that they'd need fulltime staff to hunt highplainsdem Friday #36
Just pathetic -- peer reviewed my ass Lettuce Be Friday #17
Went through two peer reviews? haele Friday #22
"The primary objectives of this research are ... To develop an explainable AI framework using TabPFNMix and SHAP for struggle4progress Friday #23
I am running out of "disgusted" synonyms to really describe my reaction to this. hlthe2b Friday #24
Just this morning I read about people inserting typos and mixed fonts... LAS14 Friday #25
Cloudflare got shut down for 10 hours last week because of one typo in an executable file. Initech Friday #29
It's crazy how fast we went from 0 to 60 on AI. Initech Friday #30
This is tangential to this thread jfz9580m Saturday #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientific reports in the...»Reply #28