Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

niyad

(128,982 posts)
34. congressional pensions--not what you may think
Sat Nov 22, 2025, 04:15 PM
Nov 22

Congressional pensions. Not exactly what many think.

Congressional pension




From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Congressional pension is a pension made available to members of the United States Congress. As of 2019, members who participated in the congressional pension system are vested after five years of service. A pension is available to members 62 years of age with 5 years of service; 50 years or older with 20 years of service; or 25 years of service at any age. A reduced pension is available depending upon which of several different age/service options is chosen. If Members leave Congress before reaching retirement age, they may leave their contributions behind and receive a deferred pension later.[1] The current pension program, effective January 1987, is under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), which covers members and other federal employees whose federal employment began in 1984 or later. This replaces the older Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) for most members of congress and federal employees.
History

Members of Congress voted to extend pension benefits to the legislative branch under the CSRS (formerly limited to the executive branch) in January 1942 under a provision of P.L. 77-411. Congress repealed their pension two months later, due to public outcry in the early months of America's involvement in World War II. It was not until after the war, in 1946, that Congress would be covered under the CSRS with the passage of P.L. 79-601. The justification this time was that a pension would "bring into the legislative service a larger number of younger members with fresh energy and new viewpoints" by encouraging older Members to retire.

The Social Security Amendments of 1983 required all Members of Congress to participate in Social Security beginning January 1, 1984.[2] As Social Security and CSRS benefits sometimes overlapped, Congress called for the development of a new federal employee retirement program to complement Social Security. This new plan was enacted as the Federal Employees' Retirement Act of 1986. This act created the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), under which new Members of Congress are currently covered.

When the FERS program went into effect, all Members elected in 1984 or later were automatically enrolled in the new plan. More senior Members were free to remain under the CSRS or enroll in the new FERS plan.[3]

The FERS program takes into account the years served and the average pay for the top three years in terms of payment. For example, a member elected before 1984 and thus qualifying under the CSRS plan, who worked for 22 years and who had a top three-year average salary of $154,267 would be eligible for a pension payment of $84,847 per year.[4] A member elected after 1984 would have been enrolled under the FERS plan, and their pension payment under similar conditions ($154,267 top three-year average salary, but with only 20 years of service, rather than the 22 in the CSRS example) would be $52,451.[4]

The accrual rate for congressional service between 1984 and December 31, 2012, is covered by a FERS "special" computation that is similar to that for Federal employees such as First Responders, FBI Special Agents, and Air Traffic Control Officers. The accrual rate is 1.7% for the first 20 years and 1.0% for each year beyond the 20th. The basic retirement annuity under FERS is equal to the (Average High-3 Salary x .017 x Years of Service through 20 years)+(High-3 Salary x .01 x Years of Service over 20)= Annual Pension Members who began congressional service before 1984 and who elected to join FERS will receive credit under FERS from January 1, 1984, forward. Thus, at the close of the 108th Congress in December 2004, participants had a maximum of 21 years of service under FERS. Assuming that a Member retired at the end of 2004 with 20 years of congressional service under FERS, and a high-3 average salary of $154,267, the initial annual FERS pension in 2005 would be: [$154,267 x .017 x 20] = $52,451 There is no maximum pension under FERS. (It would take 66 years of service under FERS to reach the 80% maximum permissible under CSRS.) The smallest unreduced FERS pension is 8.5% of high-3 salary with five years of service (.017 x 5 years), which is payable no earlier than age 62. A Member with 10 years of service who takes a FERS pension at the earliest allowable age of 55 would receive a reduced pension equal to 11% of high-3 salary (.017 x 10 years, reduced by .05 times the seven-year difference between the individual's age at retirement and age 62).[4] For Members of Congress covered by FERS after December 31, 2012, the accrual rate for congressional service covered by FERS is 1.0% per year of service, or, if the Member has at least 20 years of service and serves until at least the age of 62, the benefit accrual rate is 1.1% per year of service. This is the same accrual rate that applies to regular FERS employees and applies to members of Congress first elected in 1984 or later.[5]

In 2002, the average congressional pension payment ranged from $41,000 to $55,000.[6] As of November 2014, senior Members of Congress who have been in office for at least 32 years can earn about $139,000 a year.[7]

All senators and those representatives serving as members prior to September 30, 2003, may decline this coverage. Representatives entering office on or after September 30, 2003, cannot elect to be excluded from such coverage. Members who were already in Congress when Social Security coverage went into effect could either remain in CSRS or change their coverage to FERS.[5]

. . . . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_pension

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Just for the record, marge will receIve FIVE PERCENT of her annual niyad Nov 22 #1
Oh, the reality of it! MineralMan Nov 22 #7
She gets the healthcare though, IrishAfricanAmerican Nov 22 #39
Outrage where outrage is due...but this is exactly what every retiree in America tries to negotiate when leaving a job. CincyDem Nov 22 #2
I feel the same way. Prof. Toru Tanaka Nov 22 #6
See post 1 niyad Nov 22 #9
You're exactly right Boo1 Nov 22 #16
I'm upset that a person like MTG could get elected in the first place, but she was William Seger Nov 22 #37
+1 We should ALL have pensions leftstreet Nov 22 #18
Right there with you. Captain Stern Nov 22 #24
100% agree obamanut2012 Nov 22 #28
Wow, what a coinkydink! tanyev Nov 22 #3
see post1 niyad Nov 22 #10
Hard to believe she's only been in Congress for five years Fiendish Thingy Nov 22 #4
She barely did shit purr-rat beauty Nov 22 #5
see post 1 niyad Nov 22 #11
Duh! malaise Nov 22 #8
Ummm? But, in the case just presented .. ? Wouldn't the reverse .. ? - - -(nt)- stopdiggin Nov 22 #15
Some say, she got more out of insider trading than any pension would pay. flvegan Nov 22 #12
I'm going to be the next person to say, "And, so ..?" stopdiggin Nov 22 #13
I've done this too Boo1 Nov 22 #14
the (manufactured) 'outrage machine' works with a certain portion of the population stopdiggin Nov 22 #17
The boy who cried wolf Boo1 Nov 22 #19
Sounds like you have some issues with AOC Mysterian Nov 23 #44
Grifters gotta grift... ultralite001 Nov 22 #20
Speaking of: "Outrage farming" nt Disaffected Nov 22 #21
An earned pension isn't grifting obamanut2012 Nov 22 #29
Old Marge is shanti Nov 22 #22
What about MTG's Congressional health insurance? I would imagine... keep_left Nov 22 #23
She gets FEHB, the same as any Federal retiree obamanut2012 Nov 22 #27
Oh, I thought that retired members of Congress... keep_left Nov 22 #41
She has a right to her pension obamanut2012 Nov 22 #25
As Trump receives SAG-AFTRA benefits, I don't fault her for this. SleeplessinSoCal Nov 22 #26
Me thinks MTG may have a hard time spending her pension from inside jail after she is convicted of assorted crimes. flashman13 Nov 22 #30
Really Mblaze Nov 22 #31
Would love to see the House expel her before then! nt wiggs Nov 22 #32
She can't collect it right away Warpy Nov 22 #33
congressional pensions--not what you may think niyad Nov 22 #34
Pretty smart Greg_In_SF Nov 22 #35
She may be ignorant but she's not stupid Iris Nov 22 #36
She may be a nutty. beemerphill Nov 22 #38
That's smart Polybius Nov 22 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author Raine Nov 23 #42
The outrage here is ridiculous Wiz Imp Nov 23 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Date MTG has chosen to qu...»Reply #34