Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Post removed [View all]

MadLinguist

(890 posts)
83. Diagramming the OP sentence in agreement
Sat Oct 4, 2025, 10:27 AM
3 hrs ago

It would be nice [s to [vp have [s [np another Democrat] [vp primary and then replace [him]]]]]

S=sentence
VP= verb phrase
NP = noun phrase

You can more easily discern that "another Democrat" is the noun subject of the verb "primary " in this sentence:

It would have been nice had another Democrat primaried and then replaced him


Another way to see that "Democrat" in the OP is a noun functioning as the subject of the verb "primary" is to pluralize it in this version of the sentence:

It would be nice to have a slate of Democrats to primary and then replace him


You can also know that "primary" is being used as a verb (and therefore "Democrat" is the noun subject) is to notice the conjoined verb phrase "primary and replace him". The direct object of both verbs is "him" and the subject is "Democrat"

What would it have been nice to have?
Another Democrat to primary him
Another Democrat to replace him

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Post removed [View all] Post removed 23 hrs ago OP
I'd say ineffective JBTaurus83 23 hrs ago #1
I agree. We need guts like Pelosi used in that position. OLDMDDEM 23 hrs ago #2
She annointed him her successor displacedvermoter 22 hrs ago #27
I agree Rebl2 21 hrs ago #40
I'd say your use of "Democrat primary" is out of place on this board... Wounded Bear 23 hrs ago #3
Democrat as in have Jeffries primaried by another DEMOCRAT rather than a DEMOCRATIC candidate AStern 22 hrs ago #12
Don't quibble when caught bashing a Democratic office-holder. Stick to your guns. Hekate 22 hrs ago #17
Post removed Post removed 22 hrs ago #19
Regarding your OP, still false, but that's just my opinion Hekate 22 hrs ago #21
You're allowed to be wrong AStern 22 hrs ago #22
Sounds serious Torchlight 5 hrs ago #75
It's AOC's and My Opinion, too.. Mahalo! Cha 20 hrs ago #50
This message was self-deleted by its author Bernardo de La Paz 22 hrs ago #29
"Too afraid to endorse a Democratic candidate from his district" sheshe2 21 hrs ago #33
AOC who is in thte House Disagrees with you. Cha 19 hrs ago #63
Democrat is a noun. Democratic is an adjective. CrispyQ 5 hrs ago #78
It's Democratic not Democrat and why is he an ineffective Representative for his district? betsuni 23 hrs ago #4
In that context "Democrat" is correct BeyondGeography 23 hrs ago #9
Thank you AStern 22 hrs ago #13
'Democratic primary' or 'Democrat party primary' bigtree 22 hrs ago #18
Seriously? BeyondGeography 22 hrs ago #23
it's not the proper usage in the political sense. bigtree 22 hrs ago #31
It is proper use. Go to the OP and read the whole sentence. FoxNewsSucks 20 hrs ago #57
They are using "primary" as a verb. thought crime 15 hrs ago #68
Are you a Democratic or a Republican? padfun 4 hrs ago #80
Were you around when Newt Gingrich was Speaker of the House? He started the deliberately ungrammatical use of... Hekate 21 hrs ago #34
Yes BeyondGeography 21 hrs ago #38
I think people misunderstand SocialDemocrat61 22 hrs ago #25
Yes, and reasons why leaders are supposedly ineffective are vague: not standing up to things or meeting the moment betsuni 21 hrs ago #35
Oh & Please see Post 43.. AOC evidently knows MORE Cha 21 hrs ago #44
Just saw that, thanks for posting it here. The job is keeping Democrats united, Jeffries and Schumer are effective! betsuni 21 hrs ago #45
Before he entered leadership he was effective Bettie 23 hrs ago #5
+1 They get very "90s" leftstreet 22 hrs ago #26
True John Coktosten 23 hrs ago #6
Post removed Post removed 23 hrs ago #7
Politics as usual. Ping Tung 23 hrs ago #8
Ineffective.. Karadeniz 23 hrs ago #10
Suboptimal BannonsLiver 23 hrs ago #11
He speaks for the party but the party doesn't have the votes. bucolic_frolic 22 hrs ago #14
False. And the word is "Democratic" Hekate 22 hrs ago #15
do tell bigtree 22 hrs ago #16
Seems to be about endorsements. Oh well, sometimes matchmaking is ineffective. betsuni 22 hrs ago #28
The OP used 'Democrat' correctly. Celerity 5 hrs ago #74
The dictionary says democrat is a noun not an adjective, so democrat primary would be incorrect. CrispyQ 4 hrs ago #81
You're misreading the OP's sentence. They correctly used Democrat as a noun. This is basic English syntax. I fail to see Celerity 4 hrs ago #82
Diagramming the OP sentence in agreement MadLinguist 3 hrs ago #83
Why is he "really bad at his job"? Please elaborate. Patton French 22 hrs ago #20
... sheshe2 22 hrs ago #30
See post 7. lapucelle 16 hrs ago #66
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sheshe2 15 hrs ago #67
Indeed... Patton French 7 hrs ago #73
It's clickbait... it's meant to divide and create friction and arguments. A drive-by. QueerDuck 21 hrs ago #42
Clearly Patton French 7 hrs ago #72
I'm not sure why he should necessarily be primaried fujiyamasan 22 hrs ago #24
Small quibble about Jeffries: poli-junkie 21 hrs ago #32
I think it's engaging. It makes me want to listen closely. He's not quite as animated or expressive as a preacher... QueerDuck 21 hrs ago #41
There is currently insufficient information to properly and completely answer that question. SSJVegeta 21 hrs ago #36
What a douchebag move Blues Heron 21 hrs ago #37
Oh goody! 🍿 This will be fun, as always. QueerDuck 21 hrs ago #39
"AOC: 'Republicans have been getting walloped by Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer'" Cha 21 hrs ago #43
Mahalo, Cha. I was just about to post that. How about it, Dem bashers? Hekate 21 hrs ago #46
Mahalo to you, Hekate.. the AOC one Needs Cha 20 hrs ago #47
Uh oh, WORLDS COLLIDE! betsuni 20 hrs ago #48
AOC has turned! The Establishment(tm) got to her! W_HAMILTON 19 hrs ago #59
Tell us *specifically* what you think an """effective""" Minority Leader would be doing... W_HAMILTON 20 hrs ago #49
You are correct... and the fantasy rebellion and revolution, QueerDuck 18 hrs ago #64
Not sure, but he certainly APPEARS ineffective. Joinfortmill 20 hrs ago #51
Not according to AOC who is actually in the HOUSE Cha 14 hrs ago #70
Unfortunately , I am dissatisfied with the D leadership Bread and Circuses 20 hrs ago #52
Don't like to criticize Democats other than doc03 20 hrs ago #53
False. Quiet Em 20 hrs ago #54
And the Black Caucus JustAnotherGen 20 hrs ago #56
No JustAnotherGen 20 hrs ago #55
Not really ineffective but maybe could do better mvd 19 hrs ago #58
Democratic !! stonecutter357 19 hrs ago #60
lol True or False trump is a pig ? stonecutter357 19 hrs ago #61
My Obsevation: He seems a good Rep for his district.. He's a good guy... Ars Longa 19 hrs ago #62
False republianmushroom 17 hrs ago #65
My thoughts are that Rep. Jeffries was unanimously reelected House Minority Leader in November, 2024 by his peers. LudwigPastorius 15 hrs ago #69
This is tiresome. Jeffries is as effective as the corporate owned MAGA lovin' media will allow him to be. Greybnk48 13 hrs ago #71
Time to add to my ignore list for divisive posts lostincalifornia 5 hrs ago #76
Sometimes we need a tenacious bull dog. Like now. IcyPeas 5 hrs ago #77
Don't agree with the sentiment re Hakeem Jeffries, yorkster 5 hrs ago #79
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Post removed»Reply #83