Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Brenda

(1,819 posts)
9. Odd wording
Sun Sep 28, 2025, 07:10 PM
Sunday
CBS News analyzed a database compiled by The Violence Project. The nonprofit tracks mass shootings, which it defines as four or more people murdered in one event, not including the offender. It shows out of 195 mass shootings since 1966, 50 involved suspects who were veterans or people with military training.

To be clear, only a tiny fraction of people with military backgrounds become mass shooters. But military experience is something a disproportionate share of attackers have in common.

The first paragraph sounds like it's about 25% but goes on to say is something they have in common.

And what about all those young boys spending half their waking hours on violent military games?

Isn't that some kind of pseudo military training?

Warrior Ethos Crap?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How many mass shooters ar...»Reply #9