Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mike Nelson

(10,763 posts)
56. I did not...
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 09:35 PM
17 hrs ago

... notice. I assume he thinks the Comey indictment is wrong. Maybe he feels it's not Senate business to comment on this story? I would look back and see if he normally comments on indictments. If he normally comments, it would seem odd, as this Comey indictment is an easy one to be against, publicly .

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R spanone 23 hrs ago #1
Perhaps Schumer agrees with many on DU that Comey has a lot to answer for. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz 23 hrs ago #2
So as long as the Dem leaders don't like the people trump targets senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #4
We'll soon see if there's evidence or not. paleotn 23 hrs ago #6
Where did I say I "know something"? senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #8
Not weird at all... paleotn 23 hrs ago #9
Yes we will senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #13
Yeah all lies. choie 14 hrs ago #58
Not at all. Probably more like "Don't interrupt your opponent while they are making a mistake" Bernardo de La Paz 23 hrs ago #12
If Schumer is in no hurry to comment on the Comey indictment agingdem 22 hrs ago #22
Unlike Republicans who comment in public, Democrats could be accused bucolic_frolic 23 hrs ago #3
Should Hillary comment as well? newdeal2 23 hrs ago #5
Hillary? senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #7
Maybe his social media manager SocialDemocrat61 23 hrs ago #10
Well, I know he's not particularly tech savvy senseandsensibility 23 hrs ago #11
So what? SocialDemocrat61 22 hrs ago #15
I'm with you MorbidButterflyTat 19 hrs ago #46
Schumer is Jewish SocialDemocrat61 18 hrs ago #50
I don't see "failure to post" as an issue. Raven123 23 hrs ago #14
It shouldn't be an issue SocialDemocrat61 21 hrs ago #25
You don't think any criticism choie 14 hrs ago #59
No SocialDemocrat61 13 hrs ago #62
More than a distraction -- Comey investigated Epstein Ponietz 21 hrs ago #32
I disagree. Raven123 20 hrs ago #39
Bloomberg news reporte that Schumer, Jefferiers, and. Other Congressional lostincalifornia 22 hrs ago #16
Yes they did senseandsensibility 22 hrs ago #17
Bloomberg News name-checked Schumer. Why are you saying he's "silent" ? Hekate 22 hrs ago #19
Well, if he has made a statement I will delete this. senseandsensibility 22 hrs ago #21
See post #16. Maybe they can get you a linky. Hekate 21 hrs ago #24
You are correct. He hasn't specifically referenced the Comey indictment. He made a general statment lostincalifornia 19 hrs ago #48
I appreciate your civil response senseandsensibility 19 hrs ago #49
We are both on the same side. If I am wrong, which I was, I am not going lostincalifornia 17 hrs ago #54
But it's not on Bluesky!! MorbidButterflyTat 19 hrs ago #47
He's old guard and is resistant to change. ananda 22 hrs ago #18
Yes, Jeffries appeared on MSNBC about an hour ago senseandsensibility 22 hrs ago #20
Then when he does, a desperately dramatic SCHUMER FINALLY BREAKS HIS SILENCE alarum bashing leadership. betsuni 21 hrs ago #23
I get that you think I'm too critical of Schumer senseandsensibility 21 hrs ago #26
You are SocialDemocrat61 21 hrs ago #29
Another poster putting words in my mouth? senseandsensibility 21 hrs ago #31
Please SocialDemocrat61 21 hrs ago #33
Anyone reading this thread can see who used the words purity test senseandsensibility 21 hrs ago #35
Yes SocialDemocrat61 20 hrs ago #36
There's no test in OP, let alone a purity one Ilikepurple 20 hrs ago #38
Yes there is SocialDemocrat61 20 hrs ago #40
Assuming your conclusion in your premise then denigrating my understanding is not really an argument. Ilikepurple 18 hrs ago #53
I didn't have to denigrate your understanding SocialDemocrat61 17 hrs ago #55
I think the point is that Trump and Republicans are the problem and OP wants our leadership to be more vocal? Ilikepurple 20 hrs ago #37
Thank you senseandsensibility 20 hrs ago #41
Still don't know what people expect them to do. Don't remember everyone hanging on Pelosi's every word waiting betsuni 14 hrs ago #60
Turns out: As much as I dislike Comey, I dislike totalitarianism and Gestapo tactics MORE than Comey NeoTrajan 21 hrs ago #27
I feel bad for Comey SocialDemocrat61 20 hrs ago #42
MAGA fascism has been here before Comey's indictment and it will continue after Comey's indictment. W_HAMILTON 19 hrs ago #44
You'll regret the judicial mechanism fostered and perfected on Comey when it's used on those other persons NeoTrajan 18 hrs ago #51
Bless your heart for thinking that Comey's indictment will have any impact one way or the other. W_HAMILTON 18 hrs ago #52
Agree. betsuni 14 hrs ago #61
It sounds like the case is weak. avebury 21 hrs ago #28
I don't understand all this concern over Schumer sheshe2 21 hrs ago #30
I made an OP because I think it would be helpful for him to make a statement. senseandsensibility 21 hrs ago #34
Totally Agree, she... I try to avoid Cha 13 hrs ago #63
It most certainly is not what we need right now... sheshe2 2 hrs ago #64
Of course SocialDemocrat61 2 hrs ago #65
Fuck Comey. W_HAMILTON 19 hrs ago #43
Schumer is Jewish SocialDemocrat61 19 hrs ago #45
I did not... Mike Nelson 17 hrs ago #56
Or maybe he's more concerned about SocialDemocrat61 16 hrs ago #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So apparently Chuck Schum...»Reply #56