Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

pat_k

(11,874 posts)
Sat Sep 27, 2025, 09:01 PM 20 hrs ago

Halligan off to a brilliant start on Comey indictment [View all]

...

U.S. Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala expressed confusion and surprise at some points during the seven-minute court session...

"So this has never happened before. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another," Vaala said to Halligan. "There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson."

And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.

"The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count," Vaala said. "It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent."

Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment.

"So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two — two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from," Halligan told the judge.

Vaala responded, "You didn't see it?" And Halligan again told her, "I did not see that one."

Vaala seemed surprised: "So your office didn't prepare the indictment that they —"

Halligan then replied, "No, no, no — I — no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one — the two-count (indictment). I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hands."

"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."
..


Okay. Well. Indeed. Ms. Halligan, you are so f-ing far out of your depth it is staggering. Perhaps go back to being an insurance lawyer. You certainly have absolutely NO business attempting to prosecute a shoplifter, much less a former FBI director.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-james-comey-indictment-confusion-trump/

And if you need a little detail on how baseless/incompetent/nonsensical the indictment is, there's a little background on it in this post::

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220678536#post1


30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Holy Shit! malaise 20 hrs ago #1
Correction pat_k 20 hrs ago #4
Thanks malaise 19 hrs ago #12
Are they really making up their own charges? Baitball Blogger 20 hrs ago #2
When did the grand jury convene to bring these charges? This happened so quickly Deuxcents 20 hrs ago #5
Or are they using the results of a grand jury that concluded just the opposite of what they're doing? Baitball Blogger 20 hrs ago #7
These charges came within days of statute of limitations, got a grand jury together to charge 2 counts Deuxcents 19 hrs ago #8
The bogus case wouldn't.take long to present pat_k 19 hrs ago #10
I don't know. pat_k 19 hrs ago #9
Supposedly not about McCabe, about Richman Justice 17 hrs ago #28
Oh man! How many dots that don't connect did they... pat_k 3 hrs ago #30
I wonder if the grand jury "No billed" and they wrote up a "True bill" anyway. 3Hotdogs 17 hrs ago #21
MAGA incompetency might be the one thing that saves us from the voter incompetency that elected these dipshits. W_HAMILTON 20 hrs ago #3
Yes. And the level of incompetence is staggering. pat_k 20 hrs ago #6
Thanks malaise 19 hrs ago #11
Remember, she will be handling cases against real criminals too. Sneederbunk 19 hrs ago #13
Already, the entire 47 DOJ has lost all credibility with judges ... pat_k 18 hrs ago #18
As I said before, I smell a rat and the judge should moniss 19 hrs ago #14
My thoughts in this previous post: pat_k 17 hrs ago #27
Was it just a way to get the original charges Buddyzbuddy 19 hrs ago #15
My thought in this previous post: pat_k 17 hrs ago #26
I Don't Get It DET 18 hrs ago #16
That's how I read it too--but the story is confusing. Nt spooky3 17 hrs ago #23
I don't read fabrication into it pat_k 17 hrs ago #25
I don't read "fabrication" into it. pat_k 17 hrs ago #24
Thank You! DET 15 hrs ago #29
So, this is the government we deserve? SleeplessinSoCal 18 hrs ago #17
Dumber than rocks. Joinfortmill 17 hrs ago #19
" I didn't know we had to tell Your Honor one single consistent story: struggle4progress 17 hrs ago #20
Looks as if lawyering was not her entry in the Miss Colorado talent competition. Nt spooky3 17 hrs ago #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Halligan off to a brillia...