Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Halligan off to a brilliant start on Comey indictment [View all]
...
U.S. Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala expressed confusion and surprise at some points during the seven-minute court session...
"So this has never happened before. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another," Vaala said to Halligan. "There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson."
And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.
"The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count," Vaala said. "It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent."
Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment.
"So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from," Halligan told the judge.
Vaala responded, "You didn't see it?" And Halligan again told her, "I did not see that one."
Vaala seemed surprised: "So your office didn't prepare the indictment that they "
Halligan then replied, "No, no, no I no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one the two-count (indictment). I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hands."
"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."
..
U.S. Magistrate Judge Lindsey Vaala expressed confusion and surprise at some points during the seven-minute court session...
"So this has never happened before. I've been handed two documents that are in the Mr. Comey case that are inconsistent with one another," Vaala said to Halligan. "There seems to be a discrepancy. They're both signed by the (grand jury) foreperson."
And she noted that one document did not clearly indicate what the grand jury had decided.
"The one that says it's a failure to concur in an indictment, it doesn't say with respect to one count," Vaala said. "It looks like they failed to concur across all three counts, so I'm a little confused as to why I was handed two things with the same case number that are inconsistent."
Halligan initially responded that she hadn't seen that version of the indictment.
"So I only reviewed the one with the two counts that our office redrafted when we found out about the two two counts that were true billed, and I signed that one. I did not see the other one. I don't know where that came from," Halligan told the judge.
Vaala responded, "You didn't see it?" And Halligan again told her, "I did not see that one."
Vaala seemed surprised: "So your office didn't prepare the indictment that they "
Halligan then replied, "No, no, no I no, I prepared three counts. I only signed the one the two-count (indictment). I don't know which one with three counts you have in your hands."
"Okay. It has your signature on it," Vaala told Halligan, who responded, "Okay. Well."
..
Okay. Well. Indeed. Ms. Halligan, you are so f-ing far out of your depth it is staggering. Perhaps go back to being an insurance lawyer. You certainly have absolutely NO business attempting to prosecute a shoplifter, much less a former FBI director.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/judge-james-comey-indictment-confusion-trump/
And if you need a little detail on how baseless/incompetent/nonsensical the indictment is, there's a little background on it in this post::
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220678536#post1
30 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

When did the grand jury convene to bring these charges? This happened so quickly
Deuxcents
20 hrs ago
#5
Or are they using the results of a grand jury that concluded just the opposite of what they're doing?
Baitball Blogger
20 hrs ago
#7
These charges came within days of statute of limitations, got a grand jury together to charge 2 counts
Deuxcents
19 hrs ago
#8
I wonder if the grand jury "No billed" and they wrote up a "True bill" anyway.
3Hotdogs
17 hrs ago
#21
MAGA incompetency might be the one thing that saves us from the voter incompetency that elected these dipshits.
W_HAMILTON
20 hrs ago
#3
" I didn't know we had to tell Your Honor one single consistent story:
struggle4progress
17 hrs ago
#20
Looks as if lawyering was not her entry in the Miss Colorado talent competition. Nt
spooky3
17 hrs ago
#22