Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

dsc

(53,166 posts)

4. because the majority of blue states aren't rich in targets

Reply to Chasstev365 (Reply #3)

Wed Sep 24, 2025, 07:17 PM

Wednesday

New England already has nothing but Democratic seats. Illinois is gerrymandered as much as it really can already. CA is attempting to redraw now. WA and OR combined could give us maybe 2 seats. HI is already all D. MD could give us one seat at most. NY and NJ are the only really decent states left. NY could give us 3 or 4 and NJ could give us maybe 2.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ohio kicks off redistricting process, with Republicans looking to further gerrymander maps [View all] RandySF Wednesday OP

GQP must know they might lose BIGLY....................... Lovie777 Wednesday #1

THe gerrymandering itself is a risk. RandySF Wednesday #2

Why aren't Blue States doing the same? Chasstev365 Wednesday #3

because the majority of blue states aren't rich in targets dsc Wednesday #4