Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyCharms

(20,679 posts)
11. Think about this, Bernardo...
Wed Sep 24, 2025, 12:37 PM
Sep 24

I find it kind of ironic that a stock may have two or three analysts that estimate what quarterly earnings for the company will be.

Analysts, in my view, are just normal schmucks like me who maybe went to college and got a finance degree, who likely don't know their ass from a hole in the ground when it comes down to it. So they do a few spreadsheets, make a few assumptions, and come up with an earnings target, and then they publish it like it's the bible.

So a couple of "analysts" predict earnings will be $1.10 per share. Actual earnings come in at $1.08, so the hit piece articles come out about how the company missed earnings, giving the short sellers a perfect opportunity to short it some more, even with good future guidance from the company.

All based on the projections of a couple of loser analysts who probably have an agenda.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If stock market Price-Ear...»Reply #11